X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 1991737 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:15:24 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.68; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm64aec.bellsouth.net ([192.168.16.253]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070418140941.TZRB10799.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm64aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:09:41 -0400 Received: from mail.bellsouth.net ([192.168.16.253]) by ibm64aec.bellsouth.net with SMTP id <20070418140941.KXMQ27044.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:09:41 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.16.1 (webedge20-101-1106-101-20040924) X-Originating-IP: [68.153.219.86] From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Power source isolation Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 9:09:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20070418140941.KXMQ27044.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> Al, I have seen it happen before. No big deal. Buly > > From: "Al Gietzen" > Date: 2007/04/18 Wed AM 09:44:45 EST > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Power source isolation > > I find it a bit curious that the posting below that I sent on Sunday didn't > get posted until Tuesday. Do you suppose it was intercepted and reviewed by > the 'internet police'; because there are/were a few words in there which > might have attracted attention? All my other e-mails have been going in a > timely manner. Anyone notice e-mails delayed on this list? > > > > Al (slightly paranoid) > > > > Joe; > > > > We are still trying to resolve the settings [delete] issue, and have added a > number of additional filters on the board, the effectiveness of which is yet > to be proven. Regarding the isolation diodes, I also have Schottky diodes > between the batteries and the 'hot' bus that feeds the injector and the coil > power to prevent a failure in one battery circuit from affecting the other. > It may be that noise propagated in these circuits being isolated from the > battery is a more likely an issue than isolation of the power feeds to the > EC2. > > > > The reality is that after putting filters at the coils to [delete] spikes > coming back from there, we do not see any noise levels on any pins expected > to be of concern. But since the problem still existed we assume that there > are some spikes at times we didn't observe; and in studying the circuits, > and what is different in my setup than others; we are speculating that the > isolation diodes could exacerbate the issue. More will be known in a couple > of weeks I as get some other changes/fixes completed, and get back in the > air. After a few low-power engine runs since the addition of the filters, > there has been no changes of settings noted so far. > > > > Al > > >