X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  50 [XX]
 (67%)	URL: contains host with port number
 (33%)	BODY: text/html email has no html tag
Return-Path: <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.249] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 1990726 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:47:04 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.132.249; envelope-from=rotary.thjakits@gmail.com
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c34so13624anc
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=sAtK2qlNOu2PXs+MyaSrUmt04yqBTdETm2189Qn9Dn2BqknGIlaWMfo/rksdNVNY4Z/bAYaUy/CqY+nZu1KTiXu3qPau8uYQgkXn7e+9YIyXT6Nh35s2lt9943b8AyUh6dJWrpt9DHjEWNf9jXdbLPXqqp5vzOyc2Vt0+IRQK3Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=h5x0m4sAE64cT8G27rsN3LLY1QChJyChmBOHM8okC3JduhNkOgF0nl0ez2mQhxUhclf4UDEp4Sa9VP2vg7rTfyigjD3L/8ZFAKNVLP1cXZxusGCAy3966KMsoyN3nYtgQyfSU8f+nsBU4DXrGGFxY0l/3SQTBjYS0H0ChuY8Mk8=
Received: by 10.100.47.6 with SMTP id u6mr15693anu.1176864371639;
        Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.197.4 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <63163d560704171946g5250fba5g645dafc4f98a74e1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:46:11 -0500
From: "Thomas Jakits" <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Norton Drone Engine
In-Reply-To: <list-1990180@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_111916_3864885.1176864371578"
References: <list-1990180@logan.com>

------=_Part_111916_3864885.1176864371578
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Well, there would be ways to deal with liability, but stop production
completely?
Why not sell it then? I assume there would be some interested people to
restart!

TJ :I


On 4/17/07, cbeazley <cbeazley@innovista.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas;
> IIRC, there was some discussion (on ACRE?) that the owner of Diamond did
> not want the liability / lawsuits
> that might be associated with selling the former Midwest (norton)
> wankels in North America.
> The one-rotor may still be available with some of the Schleicher self
> launch gliders.
> A Dragonfly (N222TH in http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp ) pilotted by
> Rich Goldman, formerly on this list,
> did a forced approach as a result of what sounded like an ECU problem.
> He may be able to shed more insight
> on the Midwest wankel and the engine failure post-mortem.
>
> Cheers
> Cary
>
> > Does anuone have an insight why Diamond does not build their 2-rotor,
> > certified engine?
> > Any CoI with the Thielert Diesel sold in the Diamond planes??
> >
> > TJ
>
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>

------=_Part_111916_3864885.1176864371578
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>Well, there would be ways to deal with liability, but stop production completely?</div>
<div>Why not sell it then? I assume there would be some interested people to restart!</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>TJ :I<br><br>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">cbeazley</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:cbeazley@innovista.net">cbeazley@innovista.net</a>&gt; wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi Thomas;<br>IIRC, there was some discussion (on ACRE?) that the owner of Diamond did<br>not want the liability / lawsuits
<br>that might be associated with selling the former Midwest (norton)<br>wankels in North America.<br>The one-rotor may still be available with some of the Schleicher self<br>launch gliders.<br>A Dragonfly (N222TH in <a href="http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp">
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp</a> ) pilotted by<br>Rich Goldman, formerly on this list,<br>did a forced approach as a result of what sounded like an ECU problem.<br>He may be able to shed more insight<br>on the Midwest wankel and the engine failure post-mortem.
<br><br>Cheers<br>Cary<br><br>&gt; Does anuone have an insight why Diamond does not build their 2-rotor,<br>&gt; certified engine?<br>&gt; Any CoI with the Thielert Diesel sold in the Diamond planes??<br>&gt;<br>&gt; TJ<br>
<br><br>--<br>Homepage:&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.flyrotary.com/">http://www.flyrotary.com/</a><br>Archive and UnSub:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html">http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_111916_3864885.1176864371578--