X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Received: from ccerelbas01.cce.hp.com ([161.114.21.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTPS id 1980806 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:23:36 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=161.114.21.104; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (relay.dec.com [16.47.68.171]) by ccerelbas01.cce.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3A234269 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:22:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [16.83.193.59] (unknown [16.83.193.59]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEFC1859 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:22:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <461DC1EB.5090506@cox.net> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:21:47 -0700 From: Dale Rogers Reply-To: dale.r@cox.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mount offset References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Finn Lassen wrote:

Seems the optimal solution is no offset at all combined with a vertical stabilizer (fin) that is built to provide uplift (sidelift?) -- basically a wing turned 90 degrees.
The faster you fly the more the tail will pull to the correct side.
Isn't that what you want?

Finn

Finn,

That's a very drag-gey solution.

Dale R.