X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 1980624 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:28:55 -0400 Received: from [71.98.176.48] by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JGD00AOU5J5S0GB@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:28:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:30:14 -0400 From: Finn Lassen Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mount offset In-reply-to: To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <461D99B6.8090808@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) Seems the optimal solution is no offset at all combined with a vertical stabilizer (fin) that is built to provide uplift (sidelift?) -- basically a wing turned 90 degrees. The faster you fly the more the tail will pull to the correct side. Isn't that what you want? Finn