X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 1980336 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:06:22 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=BMears9413@aol.com Received: from BMears9413@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r8.1.) id q.c17.15b67aa2 (52828) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:05:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from WEBMAIL-MA20 (webmail-ma20.webmail.aol.com [64.12.88.84]) by cia-m01.mx.aol.com (v114_r3.5) with ESMTP id MAILCIAM014-ce5c461d69b52f9; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:05:25 -0400 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mount offset Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:05:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bmears9413@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8C94AA50626067D_D74_ECEB_WEBMAIL-MA20.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 25045 Received: from 65.182.71.8 by WEBMAIL-MA20.sysops.aol.com (64.12.88.84) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:05:25 -0400 Message-Id: <8C94AA50626067D-D74-7E92@WEBMAIL-MA20.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 64.12.88.84 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8C94AA50626067D_D74_ECEB_WEBMAIL-MA20.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Thats more in line with my thinking too. I'm going to try to make that work on mine. -----Original Message----- From: Lehanover@aol.com To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Sent: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 5:52 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mount offset In a message dated 4/11/2007 4:05:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bhughes@qnsi.net writes: Your correct Ernest. I should have specified an RV. I think all of the RV's are designed the same. I have read somewhere it is 1.25 degrees. Just trying to confirm. Bobby With no experience at all in this area, I had imagined that the engine would be turned about a vertical line through the prop flange. This, to induce the required side thrust while keeping the spinner back plate centered over the hole in the cowling. Lynn E. Hanover See what's free at AOL.com. ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. ----------MB_8C94AA50626067D_D74_ECEB_WEBMAIL-MA20.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Thats more in line with my thinking too. I'm going to try to make that work on mine.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Lehanover@aol.com
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Sent: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 5:52 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mount offset

In a message dated 4/11/2007 4:05:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bhughes@qnsi.net writes:
Your correct Ernest. I should have specified an RV. I think all of the
RV's are designed the same. I have read somewhere it is 1.25 degrees.
Just trying to confirm.

Bobby
 
With no experience at all in this area, I had imagined that the engine would be turned about a vertical line through the prop flange. This, to induce the required side thrust while keeping the spinner back plate centered over the hole in the cowling.
 
Lynn E. Hanover 



See what's free at AOL.com.
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
----------MB_8C94AA50626067D_D74_ECEB_WEBMAIL-MA20.sysops.aol.com--