Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.238; envelope-from=hansconser@gmail.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=jtEH0JI5NLkyo1c6/8BuyQzTo2aRwNZh4tghlnA1qY5XlrV3FZMjaHmTY3nTl2d7r9luQKDip2cH5MB7z0X3Lcw4xVtXyApfWp/ksq38HA7NsSzrYZk6OyCowneFpAbMj1odDU43eeTxQA44Q/dvqpvz98NfXeteGaW8UXIg1pQ=
Message-ID: <2e24f88d0702240813g7e43b671t81c0a4de3ecd6636@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:13:47 -0700
From: "Hans Conser" <hansconser@gmail.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hushpower II
In-Reply-To: <list-1860106@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <list-1860106@logan.com>

T304=better

On 2/24/07, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
> The cheapest is the T-409 a stainless alloy made for exhaust systems.
>
> Ed
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tracy Crook
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:31 AM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Hushpower II
>
>
>
> I used the one that was cheapest, can't remember the alloy.   The more
> expensive one could be polished to a mirror finish (who cares) and that was
> the only advantage as far as I know.  I used 2.25" inlet & outlet.  It's
> still working fine and has all its guts after > 300 hours.
>
> Tracy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Downing
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:59 PM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Hushpower II
>
>
> Tracy, I see in the catalog that the Hushpower II comes in T-304 and T-409,
> which is the most desirable.  My old metals book isn't very clear and from
> the ad it appears that the T-304 may be the better one as the T-409 is
> aluminized.  JohnD  Thankyou