X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 11 [X] Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1858479 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:12:54 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2007 15:11:47 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,212,1170651600"; d="scan'208"; a="53543758:sNHT47696068" Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1NKBkU2032209 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:11:46 -0500 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l1NKBOOS022326 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:11:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:11:36 -0500 Received: from [64.102.38.218] ([64.102.38.218]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:11:36 -0500 Message-ID: <45DF4A78.1020703@nc.rr.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:11:36 -0500 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooked Board - Really! References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2007 20:11:36.0411 (UTC) FILETIME=[D204C2B0:01C75786] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Ed Anderson wrote: > My highly advanced GE convection reflow oven cost $38.99 and that part > of the experiment work perfectly. Besides, I don't have room for one > that size, Mike {:>) > > The most difficult part of the experiment was placing the components > without rubbing the solder paste off the pad and knocking another > component askew. I now understand why they talked about "arm rests". > It doesn't take much to get misalign. > Ed, get a second piece of plexiglass cut. This one to have large holes to clear the solder pads, but comes in to the thickness of the components. The idea is to drop the components into a hole that will force them into alignment. All the better if it's made of a material that can stand the heat of the oven. -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o http://ernest.isa-geek.org |