X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-05.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1858043 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:00:51 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.104; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-103-061.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.103.61]) by ms-smtp-05.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l1NFxj8T023828 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:59:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000b01c75763$a60961c0$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Flooded Plugs Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:59:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Bill, I hook up a shop vac (blowing) into my throttle body and then soapy water around all the joints suspected leak areas and see if any bubbles blow. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:26 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Flooded Plugs >I will try and combine several responses here. > Yep, I know that I could not have had 257 HP. For one thing, the RPM > would have had to be up around 8K to develop that much, and for sure I > would have turned that prop at higher than 4200, BUT it still looked good > on the EM-2! :>) > I have been wondering how to tell if I have a leak in my intake manifold. > Since I built it, a leak is a definite possibility. I just haven't > figured out a way to test it without building some elaborate fixture. I > assume that since the EC-2 operates off of manifold pressure, it will > correct for a small leak. (add fuel to compensate for the additional > air??) > The plugs that I sand blasted were the Iridium plugs. They are pretty > open and can be inspected prior to install for sand. I agree that sand > blasting the RX-7 plugs would be a mistake since the 4 grounds have the > bottom of the plug almost closed off and they could not be inspected. > What is the current accepted technique for cleaning plugs? > > Bill B > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/