X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with SMTP id 1738154 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:23:09 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABC365JKAME4YQA for (sender ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 07:21:45 -0800 (PST) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkDfuvUo1Ud3Fstkr0Dm56odnjQTjBnMDbw== Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id MBB4M62G; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:21:11 PST To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 07:20:41 -0800 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ideal cooling Message-ID: <20070105.072050.2596.4.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.49 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--__JNP_000_17b7.359b.0517 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 8-6,8,12-13,21-22,28-29,40-45,47,49-50,51-32767 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 13:6:1337300147 X-MAIL-INFO:396e6ed727ebe77ace1b47d77f470aab17c71e476afa8acb276a1ec76a0e6a8ea34b8b6b6eead70bd75f270f0acf7b0f7aeb024bf3c3571be72b7b473ea74343932f23bae3fb4bba8f6337ef8aa7ef37 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ----__JNP_000_17b7.359b.0517 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 07:46:37 -0500 "Ed Anderson" writes: Trying to make an inadequate cooling system functional by using a different coolant is simply not going to work, but people keep trying. If pure water is not doing the job, then using liquids with a lower heat specific is only going to make it worst. The Egg guys have been very successful using the Evans coolant. The fluid is less efficient, so it inflates the operating temperature. But it also brings a new very high boiling point to the party. So instead of operating at the normal 200F temp, they operate at 215F. But the boil over temp is way up there...I forget, but something like 260F or so. As a result, they end up with greater safety margin. A very sound decision for their installation. This because boil over is sudden, catastrophic, and essentially irreversible. When it blows, it blows. Rumor has it that the same solution on your engine would not add safety margin, but actually reduce it. I'm skeptical of that personally, but don't have facts to evaluate. It just sounds fishy that there are components so sensitive to a mere 15F change in temp. I know how these theories can get started and hang around for lack of facts. So I don't know one way or the other, just skeptical. But here's the cool thing. We tend to think along the lines of "What can I do to improve cooling? What can I do?" But this Evans brings a new tool to the party. It's a great way to determine if you have flow volume problem. If you have inadequate coolant flow, Evans dramatically negatively effects you cooling. I've measured, logged, and tested tons of cooling concepts. Deliberately overheating engine, stuff like that. Tracy's data strongly suggests local boiling. (Bills? observation). Trapped air or low flow are leading causes. I strongly suspect low flow due to line restrictions. I think we've got lot's of guys operating with 70% less flow than the engine normally sees, and that puts them right on the edge of this problem. FWIW. -al wick Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable valve lift and cam timing. Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from Portland, Oregon Glass panel design, Subaru install, Prop construct, Risk assessment info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html ----__JNP_000_17b7.359b.0517 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 07:46:37 -0500 "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>= =20 writes:
Trying to make an inadequate cooling system = functional=20 by using a different coolant is simply not going to work, but people keep= =20 trying.  If pure water is not doing the job, then using liquids with= a=20 lower heat specific is only going to make it worst. =20
 
The Egg guys have been very successful using the Evans coolant. The = fluid=20 is less efficient, so it inflates the operating temperature. But it also = brings=20 a new very high boiling point to the party. So instead of operating at the= =20 normal 200F temp, they operate at 215F. But the boil over temp is way up=20 there...I forget, but something like 260F or so. As a result, they end up = with=20 greater safety margin. A very sound decision for their installation. This=20 because boil over is sudden, catastrophic, and essentially irreversible. = When it=20 blows, it blows.
 
Rumor has it that the same solution on your engine would not add = safety=20 margin, but actually reduce it. I'm skeptical of that personally, but = don't=20 have facts to evaluate. It just sounds fishy that there are components so=20 sensitive to a mere 15F change in temp. I know how these theories can get=20 started and hang around for lack of facts. So I don't know one way or the = other,=20 just skeptical.
 
But here's the cool thing. We tend to think along the lines of "What = can I=20 do to improve cooling? What can I do?" But this Evans brings a new tool to = the=20 party. It's a great way to determine if you have flow volume problem. If = you=20 have inadequate coolant flow, Evans dramatically negatively effects you = cooling.=20 I've measured, logged, and tested tons of cooling concepts. Deliberately=20 overheating engine, stuff like that. Tracy's data strongly suggests local=20 boiling. (Bills? observation). Trapped air or low flow are leading causes. = I=20 strongly suspect low flow due to line restrictions. I think we've got lot's= of=20 guys operating with 70% less flow than the engine normally sees, and that = puts=20 them right on the edge of this problem.
 
FWIW.
 

-al wick
Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable = valve=20 lift and cam timing.
Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ = hours=20 from Portland, Oregon
Glass panel design, Subaru install, Prop construct= ,=20 Risk assessment info:
http:= //www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html
----__JNP_000_17b7.359b.0517--