X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1736726 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:51:08 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.64; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm56aec.bellsouth.net ([209.214.147.52]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070105025017.PFMP10904.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm56aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:50:17 -0500 Received: from [209.214.147.52] by ibm56aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070105025016.DVBR20020.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@[209.214.147.52]> for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:50:16 -0500 Message-ID: <459DBCE4.9020507@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:50:12 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ideal cooling References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit al p wick wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:49:13 -0500 "Tracy Crook" > writes: > > > > Paul has done a lot to perpetuate the idea that my cooling > system is "marginal at best". I still can't figure out where > he gets this from. You do not fly an aircraft for 12 years > and 1600+ hours in Florida, fly it to the desert southwest > over 10,000+ foot mountains and win air races with a > "marginal" cooling system. Much has been made of the 'spray > bar' cooling system I used when racing. > > I don't know the details about your cooling system, so can't say if > it's marginal or not. A marginal cooling system is one that can be > affected by outside factors. It's a relatively new concept we learned > from the Japanese. If you find yourself throttling back on hot day, or > watching your climb rate for fear of overheating, then you have > marginal system. The irony is that you can fly for years with a > marginal system and still live to tell about it. It's also ironic that > you can manage a marginal system and get by. So it's real easy to > discount the concept. > > But when you look at crashes, sure enough, you will find that suddenly > the odds caught up to the pilot. Distracted by the marginal system, he > didn't notice.... That forced landing last year was excellent > example. Statistically, we want robust systems that handle > uncontrollable outside factors. This provides a measurable drop in > risk. This is a new concept. It has profound effect. But you can live > your whole life and never appreciate the significance. > > My comment on spraybar was wrong. It can be an asset, particularly for > initial testing. It's highly effective method and can bring extra > safety margin. > > -al wick > Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable valve lift and cam > timing. > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from Portland, > Oregon > Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info: > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html Virtually every type certificated aircooled aircraft that has speed capability beyond bush plane category has a marginal cooling system, by that definition. Just a data point... Charlie