X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.203] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with SMTP id 1732126 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:27:04 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.198.203; envelope-from=dcarter11@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 43662 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2007 06:26:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=QuBhyCdrA3qvwWLdpuKo/dWwwco2svYtlRYTAIGHpPSMqmsG3wjTPtJzzofHGX89bZlbpN24whMs5ZXVhbHKzLx1/hLwcMk/kvOSYIrFuy4OpwQkLwbvNN4hITdEACayccCYud1eBsG8n0Sf7wjRk+6b22nxCd28qx4hfeAJwaA= ; Received: from unknown (HELO davidsdell8200) (dcarter11@sbcglobal.net@70.57.90.228 with login) by smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2007 06:26:15 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: cOg6F1EVM1lS6pGEyMSy.lWvDfuvzNJqkB7OA2RwRZJ1o8J6Hfd2JK9ERJJ6YIIEKrBNd_IIosSCt5GVO.5D12XOQiNJPisxzhWOTX9bu1juXHW86wvIumN3c7mGiSzlbLSm3MbYW1nl3Sg- Message-ID: <019801c72f00$10e24c00$0701a8c0@davidsdell8200> From: "David Carter" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EM2 Data Logger pix Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:26:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Monty, I don't understand what you are saying/implying about the "large diameter rad hoses" ("The reason for cars requiring large diameter rad hoses is now less muddy in my muddy fuddled brain."). I'm planning to run autosized rad hose and split into two parallel smaller hoses into two evap cores, with everything (inside area of fittings) sized to be equal to the auto hose inside area. I'm definitely NOT going to run the smaller hoses and fittings used by most folks so far. Just goes against my sense of "basics". David Carter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Monty Roberts" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:29 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EM2 Data Logger pix > Ed brings up a very good point as well, the coolant flow is dropping. Once > again .....transients! > > The reason for cars requiring large diameter rad hoses is now less muddy > in my muddy fuddled brain. > > Boy Racer on the throttle to the next stop light. Lots of heat load > followed by idling at the light in 110 deg weather with the AC running. > > No similarity to continuous operation. > > There goes the argument for 2 in rad hose and a Mac truck radiator in an > airplane. > > Steady state data is key here. > > Now I am going to bed. > > Monty