X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 73 [XX] (80%) OBFUSCATED_WORD1_MONEY (20%) BODY: contains stock spam words Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net ([204.127.200.85] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1724063 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:33:42 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.200.85; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from house1 (c-68-59-245-39.hsd1.tn.comcast.net[68.59.245.39]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTP id <20061229173249015004v26se>; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:32:54 +0000 Message-ID: <00e801c72b6f$5d35ce40$6701a8c0@farr.com> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: SNF Open Flight Line Policy Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:32:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 If you want to see the results of that kind of action, check out: http://tinyurl.com/ykdhb6 And as that legend press release tells you, faa controllers are the ones in charge. As for the British origin plastic 2-seater fellow, maybe they were just glad to get him on the ground with all about him still in one piece. I haven't flown in and camped, before, after or during, since many a year ago when I realized all those giant mosquito jokes weren't really jokes; but, if you still want to do so, and at or about departure times, isn't hanging out somewhere else and/or just chugging on over to plant city and eating a high$hamburger, while working on developing patience perhaps a little better than dodge ball? After all, that part of the world almost has wall to wall airports. JMHO jofarr, soddy tn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie England" Al Gietzen wrote: > what was scary was the number of "fellow" pilots that seemed > unable to fly around the shoreline at 80mph, 1200', and follow the > plane ahead. maybe they all wanted to do 25 laps, or watch too > much NASCAR. these people were also going to land overhead or > behind me when the runway finally got cleared > > Kevin; > > I guess I would be one of those guys. Some of us have planes that > stall at 80 mph. On the other hand, I had it up to 220 mph (TAS) > last week. It’s a problem in the pattern as it seems I’m always > eating up a Cessna. I don't know if that's a joke, or you've never flown in the 'really big show' environment. There's a separate procedure for planes that can't maintain 80. Last spring I went down there with a friend in a Mooney & we spent over an hour at Lake Parker because they wouldn't let anyone land during heavy departures after the airshow. It was like playing dodgeball the whole time. For about a half hour, there was one of those British origin glass 2seaters that crossed through the existing circle of planes several times, then when they released us to the airport, cut off several planes entering downwind to the runway, then cut off several more turning base/final. Any one of his actions should have cost him his ticket for at least a month. Controllers never said a word to him.