Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.167; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net
Message-ID: <48f801c717bf$5bf7b020$a45ee0c9@usuario5ebe209>
From: "Thomas y Reina Jakits" <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1638442@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: metric system -
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:14:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sorry Ernest,

just for a moment I FORGOT the REAL priorities!

Thomas :)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ernest Christley" <echristley@nc.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:55 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: metric system -


> Thomas y Reina Jakits wrote:
>
>> Maybe some one is deep enough involved to guess/suggest:
>>
>> On a system like the Space Shuttle, where every ounce costs a lot of 
>> fuel/money/loss-of -payload:
>> Would it not have been more efficient/economic if Thiocol would have 
>> built one end assembly plant each right at the launch complexes to make 
>> the SRBs the optimum size ( not compromised by railroads and horses 
>> backsides?)
>>
>> TJ
>>
>
> Yes.  But then some Congressman couldn't have gone home and told everyone 
> how he "brought home the bacon...err...I mean, JOBS."
> Where ARE your priorities, Tom?!  Sheesh.  Let's keep some focus here, 
> guys.
>
> -- 
>         ,|"|"|,              Ernest Christley       |
> ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----    Dyke Delta Builder      |
>        o|  d  |o        http://ernest.isa-geek.org  |
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
>