X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Received: from mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.186] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTPS id 1637357 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:00:27 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.186; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-178-1.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.178.1]) by mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id kB47xwLZ001293 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 18:59:59 +1100 Message-ID: <004a01c7177a$32e90750$01b2ecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: metric system - Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:59:57 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0653-0, 03/12/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Not entirely correct - but who the hell cares. You will find 4'8" was the original spacing but a 1/2" was added for some reason that I can't remember. The English didn't build the railway, they supplied the first lot of railway engines. The 2 horses arce/ ass is a furphy- apparently! I guess it depends on what you read on the internet > Dave, close but not excatly right! > > Here the copy of a post from the Atlantica-list (Wingco - BWB - aircraft): > > JUST A QUESTION OF STANDARDS > > Especially this part. > Does the statement, "We've always done it that way" ring any bells...? > The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, > 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used? > Because that's the way they built them in England, and English > expatriates built the US Railroads. > > Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines > were > built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's > the > gauge they used. > Why did "they" use that gauge then? Because the people who built the > tramways > used the same jigs and > tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing. > > > Okay! Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? > Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would > break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that's > the > spacing of the wheel ruts. > > So who built those old rutted roads? Imperial Rome built the first long > distance > roads in Europe (and > England) for their legions. The roads have been used ever since. > And the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, > which > everyone else had to > match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were > made for Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel > spacing. > > The United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is > derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war > chariot. > > And bureaucracies live forever. > > So the next time you are handed a spec and told we have always done it > that way and wonder what horse's ass came up with that, you may be exactly > right, because the Imperial Roman war chariots were made just wide > enough to accommodate the back ends of two war horses. > Now the twist to the story... > > When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two > big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are > solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their > factory in Utah. The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred > to > make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the > factory to the launch site. > > The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in > the mountains. The SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is > slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now > know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds. > So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably > the world's most advanced transportation system was determined over two > thousand > years > ago by the width of a Horse's ass. > And you thought being a horse's ass wasn't important ?? > Correction: Horses arse!! > > TJ :)) > > > >> >> On 27, Nov , at 7:07 AM, Sandy wrote: >> >>> Let me make sure I have this right. >>> Two horse's ass's (how do you spell the plural of ass?) determined the >>> diameter of the Space Shuttle booster rockets. Is that about it? >>> >> Ass is another name for a donkey; the word you want is 'arse' and the >> plural of arse is arses >> The width of a roman road was determined by the wheel tracks of a roman >> war chariot drawn by two horses side by side. When the railroads were >> developed in England they followed the main arterial roads which were >> originally the roman roads, so the rails were laid on the wheel tracks; >> about 5 feet apart. 19th century rail technology in the US came from >> England so US railroads indirectly were based on roman roads. The space >> shuttle boosters were designed to be transported by rail so the width was >> based on roman two horse chariots. >> That is about it, BR, Dave McC >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >> > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/