|
Very well said Don and a very good example of why buying into System International is worthwhile, but it isn't any better unless everyone does it. Todd
On 11/28/06,
Donald Willard Garrett <nospam@avamail.net> wrote:
Re Metric Military;
I'm not sure how declaring the military "metric" simplifies things much:
On the ground, things come in anything you can think of, and some things you never heard of, depending on where you are doing business and who
you buy it from (what does it say on the label?) 20mm, 30mm, .50 cal and 40mm are all good, though the 40mm launcher on the M-203 hurts your shoulder after awhile, depending on the round you use; and a good helping of 8-inch or 2000 pounders can really turn a bad situation around.
If you get a call for an airstrike, it could come in km or sm, either way you convert it into nm to fly there, then back into feet (decimal, not inches), lat-long and degrees (also in decimals) to put a weapon
solution on it, though for CAS you might need to keep the metric equivalents handy for talking to the ground guys, depending on who they are. If your customer is an artillery guy, you'll get milliradians with
your meters. Altitude is in feet most places not ICAO, which is moot when you hit the flight levels--give me a number, I can't tell by looking out the window either way (doesn't US ATC give distance in sm?)
Don't go head-to-head with a bad guy inside 9,000 ft, you'll hit him,
though how you spot 9,000 when it occupies roughly the same second as 3 sm and zero is a personal matter I suppose. If I recall correctly, bombs fall and burst in meters and psi, and penetrate via fps. Radars give
range in nm, altitude in feet, while things like gating can still show up in sm. Guns and rockets are in meters and fps, missiles are in feet and mach (or is it the other way around?) Release altitude is in feet:
baro / MSL or AGL / radar depending on weapon type, fusing etc, though that doesn't mean the slant-range won't be in meters, and the canopy correction factor for the HUD is in diopters.
On your way there don't forget to be true if not magnetic, either way
where does your device of choice switch to great circle--and we still keep that sextant handy when we get too far from land, if there is room for it in the cockpit. Fuel in pounds, speed in mach number or knots,
OAT in Celsius for fuel flow calcs; your choice of ground, indicated, calibrated or true to get things over into nm, which are the numbers the strike package uses when flying tactically who cares anyway since that
doesn't include winds aloft which inertial or GPS can only reads cumulative or instantaneous and weatherpersons (Fahrenheit and millibars) are as reliable and truthful as lawyers. So for fuel, just give me a number, preferably in minutes at my current (indicated)
airspeed, relative to the target / nearest suitable runway as I go along: though lingering a few seconds too long in AB (that's re-heat over in metric, zone five in swabby) converts everything into chapter and verse (Psalms work well).
D. Garrett
Todd Bartrim wrote:
|
|