Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=Dastaten@earthlink.net
Message-ID: <44E2C86E.9090806@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:25:34 -0500
From: David Staten <Dastaten@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: New NA exhaust finished
References: <list-1333212@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1333212@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bulent Aliev wrote:

> My idea was to have a "stepped" release of the sound energy. First  
> will expand some in the oval section, than expand more in the  
> augmentor tube while mixing with cooler air being sucked by the  
> velocity of the exhaust gasses. After that being chopped by the prop  
> blades?
> Buly
>
> -- 
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
>
Looks good, buly... I'm not so hesitant now about strait pipe exhaust 
now. We are unable to mate our turbo housing onto the exhaust manifolds 
that we have without interfering with the Mistral Intake.. and the 
Mistral is gonna stay AS IS.. so we have to work around it.

Chris.. if you are reading this.. any desire/opposition against two 
straight pipes coming out and swept DOWN/BACK (through a cowl cutout) so 
that they arent aiming at the prop disk? or try to emulate what Buly has 
here.. which he emulated from John Slade..?

Dave