X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1235526 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:12:52 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2006 14:12:04 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,238,1149480000"; d="scan'208"; a="92680300:sNHT22963580" Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6DIC3vv011574 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:12:03 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k6DIC3dU015484 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:12:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:12:03 -0400 Received: from [64.102.38.136] ([64.102.38.136]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:12:03 -0400 Message-ID: <44B68CF3.1040404@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:12:03 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: heater References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2006 18:12:03.0443 (UTC) FILETIME=[D7A6F430:01C6A6A7] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Kelly Troyer wrote: > Ernest, > > Are these "gills" to be on the exterior of the skin ? If > so has any > > consideration been given to possible disruption to airflow and lift in > > this area of the strake ? How about a drawing (crude or otherwise) > Yeah, Jim and I discussed this earlier. 1/2" high. Directing the air along the tops skin. They'll probably be less disruptive than the hinge pylons (which I won't have). -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o http://ernest.isa-geek.org |