X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1235462 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:13:58 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2006 13:13:14 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,238,1149480000"; d="scan'208"; a="92672596:sNHT25042176" Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6DHDETJ021939 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:13:14 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k6DHDDdU029401 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:13:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:13:13 -0400 Received: from [64.102.38.136] ([64.102.38.136]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:13:13 -0400 Message-ID: <44B67F29.4050104@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:13:13 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: heater References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2006 17:13:13.0748 (UTC) FILETIME=[9FCA3D40:01C6A69F] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Kelly Troyer wrote: > Snip > > I believe your numbers are atypical. Most guys are seeing higher oil > > than water temps. But I believe that will be an installation specific > > condition. I'll be running without a thermostat. The water has a lot > > more thermal mass than the oil, so I expect the oil to come up to temp > > much faster. I'm planning a sliding door to cut the airflow through the > > strake mounted ducts, so it probably won't matter. I can get the temps > > up quickly on either one. But I still think the oil will get hotter > > faster than the water. > > Ernest, > Sliding door where ?? Inlet or outlet ?? > > Kelly T Outlet. The part of the duct that made into the wheel-well will come up to meet the top skin, which will have shark gills molded into it. It's a simple matter to have a cable controlled aluminum plate that will slide between the two, blocking off some of the exit holes. My plan for building the shark gills is to use strips of 2" tape laid parallel. The first is laid, then half covered lengthwise with a piece of 2" wide, 1/2" thick foam. A strip of 2" tape is laid down so that it runs off both ends but only covers 1/2 of the foam lengthwise. Another foam strip and more tape, etc. Each strip is actually several plies for strength, and each will give about 5in^2 of exit area. There won't be any holes going straigth down, as I don't want this to be a funnel for rain water.I have room for about 8 to 10. Way more than necessary, but it is easier to cut back than to add on, and having a panel that will cover what isn't necessary make it better. -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o http://ernest.isa-geek.org |