Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <list-1211827@logan.com>
References: <list-1211827@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <B6A315A3-0B3E-4E8A-979C-FA73242CD340@bellsouth.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: damage report
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:55:01 -0400
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Joe, it was 3/16" play at the tip. But i would go with Tracy's 3mm =20
seals. Than you'll have one thing less to worry about.
Buly
On Jun 29, 2006, at 7:30 AM, Ed Anderson wrote:

> Joe, from my memory banks, I believe Lynn Hanover suggested =20
> 3/16" (0.1875) was the maximum of what might be considered an =20
> acceptable seal.  Personally, I would not put a rotor back into my =20
> engine that was very near the limit.  Had one experience with that =20
> already - not interested in a repeat.
>
> Ed
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joe Hull
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:47 AM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: damage report
>
> > Putting in the old seal by its end, the most play I can find is
>
> >1/32" at the other end of the seal.
>
> >Am I correct to assume that is good?
>
>
>
> I know someone here (Lynn?) gave this procedure as a good way to =20
> check the apex seal slot tolerance. I=92ve spent the last hour =20
> looking through emails and can=92t find it. I can=92t remember the =20
> distance either. My slots are more like .10=94 movement on the end.
>
>
>
> Joe Hull
>
> Cozy Mk-IV #991 (In Phase1 Flight Test - 40.2 hrs flown)
>
> Redmond (Seattle), Washington
>
>

Buly
http://tinyurl.com/dcy36