Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.201.220; envelope-from=prvt_pilot@yahoo.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=g20L2YUL4QzAMvcr9+2usuh8wFTzNDBDA1q16NP8bVRXDyHfEvlX6hYgk+jQ/tjnYSMrKatYu6WMttqmO0Ui4GqFbsaFqmhgQVDkAw+SxIGLxKoC8iC4oQUgInVylzqWQp/64JjdPIDLWFo8/RwnmY0MXNgtR1gH/fZbnuNhV2A=  ;
Message-ID: <20060628224954.83812.qmail@web30112.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Brooks <prvt_pilot@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Time marches on...parts get made
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-1210699@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Buly,
The canard time is probably a better option than the
few beers method.

Both options will probably get you airborn, but the
canard time may yeild the better landing.

I have the spacers with my IVO prop to switch to a 2
blade prop, so there is even another reason that I'd
like to see how you do without the turbo.

Would be nice to get a 3 vs 2 blade comparison.

Steve

--- Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Steve, I'm trying to get some canard time first. Or
> just have few  
> beers and go:)
> Waiting for the 2 blade conversion parts to come any
> day. Want to see  
> what RPM I'll get with the 2 blade.
> Buly
> On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:
> 
> > Buly,
> > When do you think that you're going to fly without
> the
> > turbo ??
> >
> > I'm waiting to hear a flight report.
> >
> > Steve Brooks
> >
> >
> > --- Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Richard. Now I have to learn to fly that
> >> thing without making
> >> a merry widow of my wife :)
> >> Last evening, after removing the turbo and making
> >> bunch of
> >> improvements including IVO electric 68" prop, I
> >> loaded the minister
> >> of finance  (she ordered me ) and went to make
> three
> >> high speed taxis
> >> with the new prop. What a kick in the back! These
> >> props make big
> >> difference on take off by allowing you to develop
> >> high rpm from the
> >> start. Since I ordered this prop for my turbo
> >> installation, I'm a bit
> >> low on the rpm. Will try it by converting the
> same
> >> prop (68" with
> >> pitch 45-105 range)  to two blade. My prop
> >> calculator http://
> >> www.hoverhawk.com/propspd.html  tells me for best
> >> thrust I must spin
> >> the engine at least to 6500 - 7000 rpm. I'm about
> >> 1000 rpm short
> >> right now. I was surprised to see my manifold
> >> pressure go past 30". i
> >> did not understand why my TAS stays at 18 when
> the
> >> plane is not
> >> moving, but goes up with the forward speed? I was
> >> expecting to see it
> >> at zero?.
> >> Buly
> >> On Jun 28, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Richard Sohn wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Buly and Ernest,
> >>>
> >>> you guy's can only be proud with your plan-built
> >> projects. You are
> >>> way ahead of us kit builders as far as
> dedication
> >> is concerned in
> >>> addition of everything else. I have watched
> >> several Easy builders
> >>> over the years, and at my visit to Ernest last
> >> Christmas, I
> >>> realized again how much difference there is
> >> between kit and plan
> >>> when Ernest explained to me how he managed to
> >> manufacture SS
> >>> channel because it could not bought anywhere. I
> >> think plan-builders
> >>> are the creme of the experimenters community.
> >>> FWIW.
> >>>
> >>> Richard Sohn
> >>> N-2071U
> >>
> >> --
> >> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >> Archive and UnSub:
> >> http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> > Archive and UnSub:  
> http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
> 
> Buly
> http://tinyurl.com/dcy36
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:  
> http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
>