X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1180275 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:15:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-111-186.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.111.186]) by ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5GCEZgT011630 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:14:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000501c6913e$8fa56960$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: ***SPAM*** [FlyRotary] Re: Oil Cooling Issues Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:15:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine >From my reading, it appears that the most effective duct... Ed, I'm sure glad someone is willing to wade through those tomes and distill it for the rest of us!! Yep, I've been on the other list long enough to get the gist of what the ducts ought to be like. I even had a really nice smooth duct that was about what you described before I started making modifications! I'll keep after this oil cooling thing till it's solved - what are my choices? (s'pose I could go to the dark side like Rusty - NOT!) Joe Hull Cozy Mk-IV #991 (In Phase1 Flight Test - 30.1 hrs flown) Redmond (Seattle), Washington Provided you have sufficient core volume and coolant flow then its just a matter of working the airflow until it handles the heat load. Like I mentioned, it took me five different attempts, some of which I can look back on now and almost laugh about they were so woefully inadequate {:>) Ed