X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1155673 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:56:51 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2006 12:55:53 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,137,1149480000"; d="scan'208"; a="90133565:sNHT32509706" Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k5FGtqYL013254 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:55:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:55:52 -0400 Received: from [64.102.38.136] ([64.102.38.136]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:55:52 -0400 Message-ID: <44919118.6020101@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:55:52 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Remove Turbo References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2006 16:55:52.0773 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FC10F50:01C6909C] Ed Anderson wrote: > Anything you can do to reduce the power and therefore heat your engine > is developing will reduce the BTU of waste heat your cooling system > must deal with. Leaning would reduce the heat load - but, whether > sufficiently to materially affect your cooling is another story. My > calculations shows the following: > > Rpm A/F ratio Fuel Flow BTU > 1000 12:1 2.9 1417 > 1000 14.7 2.3 1157 > 1000 17.4 2.0 987 > > However, keep in mind that at lower idle RPM you need a richer > mixture to keep the engine turning over, so you can not lean the > engine as much at idle as you can up in the air at cruise. > > My 0.02 worth If it were possible, cutting the BTU by 30% would just have to help. 'Course, that's just an semi-educated opinion. I was thinking a little more throttle and a little less fuel, with the goal of having the excess air carry off a disproportionate amount of heat. I've heard you say that in cruise you can use the mixture knob to very effectively control power. Why not on the ground? Set the throttle to quarter or even half open and bring the mixture down till it will barely keep turning. Note: I still don't have an engine running, or I'd be experimenting with this myself and reporting the results. -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o http://ernest.isa-geek.org |