X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1154998 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:22:29 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.37; envelope-from=ARGOLDMAN@aol.com Received: from ARGOLDMAN@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id q.224.4f2bcc2 (29679) for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:21:39 -0400 (EDT) From: ARGOLDMAN@aol.com Message-ID: <224.4f2bcc2.31c22c43@aol.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:21:39 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Remove Turbo To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1150341699" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5026 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1150341699 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/14/2006 6:49:48 PM Central Standard Time, atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes: Hi Rich, Scat tubing does not have inner wall and you can see the wire coil on the inside. Sceet tubing has an inner wall that is known to separate and collapse. Buly Corrrect Buly, What I was responding to is the following exchange in a privious posting: > Buly, > I'm using the silicone version of SCAT tubing, which is called > SCEET tubing > > At any rate, It seems to be pretty rigid, and holds its shape well > on bends. > I'm using it to supply fresh air to the turbo, and haven't had any > issues > with it. It is not real cheap, but take a look at this link for ACS. > > http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/sceet.php > > Regards, > Steve Brooks > <> Perhaps what Steve, was and you were referring to, by your statement was SCAT, not SCEET, however, better for me to err on the side of safety. If he did mean SCEET, perhaps that post saved a bad day. SCAT is the silicone version of CAT, SCEET is the silicone version of CEET Just want to keep you guys flying until all the bugs are worked out so I can copy you (secondary purpose is to keep y'all alive) Rich -------------------------------1150341699 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 6/14/2006 6:49:48 PM Central Standard Time,=20 atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>Hi=20 Rich,
Scat tubing does not have inner wall and you can see the wire coi= l=20 on 
the inside. Sceet tubing has an inner wall that is known to=20 separate 
and collapse.
Buly
Corrrect Buly, What I was responding to is the following exchange in a=20 privious posting:
 
> Buly,
> I'm using the silicone version of SCAT tubing, which= is=20 called 
> SCEET tubing
>
&= gt; At=20 any rate, It seems to be pretty rigid, and holds its shape well 
&g= t;=20 on bends.
> I'm using it to supply fresh air to the turbo, and haven't= had=20 any 
> issues
> with it.  It is not real cheap, but t= ake=20 a look at this link for ACS.
>
>=20 http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/sceet.php
>
>=20 Regards,
> Steve Brooks
>

<<Thanks Steve, I just bo= ught=20 some and will install it in the morning.
Buly>>
 
Perhaps what Steve, was and you were referring to, by your=20 statement was SCAT, not SCEET, however, better for me to err on the sid= e of=20 safety. If he did mean SCEET, perhaps that post saved a bad day. SCAT i= s=20 the silicone version of CAT, SCEET is the silicone version of CEET
 
Just want to keep you guys flying until all the bugs are worked out so=20= I=20 can copy you (secondary purpose is to keep y'all alive)
 
Rich

-------------------------------1150341699--