Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <list-1154636@logan.com>
References: <list-1154636@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <50B36D49-9AA4-43AC-B34F-D75DB895EF79@bellsouth.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Remove Turbo
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:48:46 -0400
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>


On Jun 14, 2006, at 6:31 PM, ARGOLDMAN@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 6/14/2006 4:46:09 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
> prvt_pilot@yahoo.com writes:
> At any rate, It seems to be pretty rigid, and holds its shape well  
> on bends.
> I'm using it to supply fresh air to the turbo, and haven't had any  
> issues
> with it.  It is not real cheap, but take a look at this link for ACS.
>
> Bully and Steve,
>
> I may be incorrect, but somewhere in the back of my mind, on some  
> list or article, there was a suggestion not to use SCEET on the  
> intake system because of degeneration of the internal coating and  
> chips (silicon) being drawn into the intake system.
>
> I can't remember what or where, but I too used that stuff in my  
> induction system and was somewhat shocked to read about it. Further  
> research might be in order. I hope my memory is wrong as it is nice  
> stuff, relatively easy to work with and seems to do it's job well.
>
> Rich (possible bearer of tubularly bad news)
>
>
Hi Rich,
Scat tubing does not have inner wall and you can see the wire coil on  
the inside. Sceet tubing has an inner wall that is known to separate  
and collapse.
Buly
>