X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtp101.plus.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.234] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with SMTP id 1153935 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:18:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.206.234; envelope-from=prvt_pilot@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 85662 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 13:18:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=g/Iwb6Aoe/kUfBVFRZSbM1o+B3qEXPZak3bux5yExyI+LCSQjlwcIqDEPlG0+RRyhFwwy+RRYsBqUkyJiApO+UycWejlk87Py0ibZsE6rLtJMtVVtjiD0VagWayoW3tYfs0Prqo+woBjMzpU9C/payyyG5qd3HtwJ2E9op9SX2Q= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (prvt?pilot@71.55.77.125 with plain) by smtp101.plus.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 13:18:04 -0000 From: Steve Brooks To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Remove Turbo Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:18:26 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606140918.26834.prvt_pilot@yahoo.com> Buly, With your engine, removing the turbo makes sense. You can probably get enough horsepower with the NA setup. In my case, with a lower compression turbo engine, I'll have to stick with the turbo to get enough power. I have about 42 hours now on my already used stock turbo, with no problems. I have been nursing it along though, and don't exceed 5-6 lbs of boost on takeoff, and usually fly at 0-2 lbs of boost max. Sometimes I cruise around at less power than that to conserve fuel, if I'm just flying around. I do think that the stock turbo is going to fail, and I have all of the parts to convert to a T04 turbo, which appears to be the best long term turbo solution. As I recall, when Dave had his turbo trouble, he gutted the turbo, and still used his same exhaust system. Is that what you did, or did you redo your exhaust ? Steve Brooks On Tuesday 13 June 2006 11:21 pm, Bulent Aliev wrote: > On Jun 13, 2006, at 10:13 PM, John Slade wrote: > > Joe, Buly > > I think the bottom line on my "escapades" is that the stock turbo > > just isn't up to the task. So far I have about 25 hours on my T04 > > Turbonetics + external wastegate setup with zero problems. The > > engine is purring very smoothly these days. Just a matter of using > > the right tools for the job. > > John > > Just came from the hangar. Managed to convert the engine to NA in 3 > hours. Didn't run it since it was almost 11PM and I was missing one > plug for the cooling port for the turbo. > While doing it, I opened up John's old stock turbo that he imported > from NZ. Many of the turbine blades were missing chunks. > That convinced me that it was the right thing to do. At the moment > I'm not up-to spending another 2G's for a T4 turbo after I just spent > $2,400 for a prop. Hope I'm able to spin the prop to the static RPM > needed? The good part is I can convert it to a 2 blade fast :) > Buly > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/