X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 1153887 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:19:21 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.65; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net
Received: from ibm70aec.bellsouth.net ([65.11.38.45])
          by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP
          id <20060614121602.HEES27842.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm70aec.bellsouth.net>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:16:02 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.58] (really [65.11.38.45])
          by ibm70aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP
          id <20060614121602.PLSO5063.ibm70aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.0.58]>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:16:02 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <list-1153858@logan.com>
References: <list-1153858@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <C69C3C1C-089F-4DA0-969F-4FA92F0778E4@bellsouth.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Remove Turbo
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:16:07 -0400
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)


On Jun 14, 2006, at 8:01 AM, jesse farr wrote:

> I know I may be preaching immersion to a bunch of sprinklers; but,  
> having seen the beauty of turbo normalizing for many hours, I can't  
> help but think it might would work better here than the full flow  
> turbo route you fellers seem to keep following. Why not, next time  
> any of those who actually can get to the completion point of flying  
> one of these things, you try straight, complete, exhaust dump with  
> waste gate only partially closing off exhaust and thereby forcing  
> partial pressure through turbo for sufficient boost to maintain sea  
> level atmospheric pressure rather than running everything through  
> turbo and trying to reduce excess by waste gate bleed off ? Stock  
> engine performance with no excessive amount of pressure, wear and  
> tear over ground running all the way up to where comfortable, cool  
> and fast. Now, if I have drawn the wrong conclusion, it would not  
> be the first time. <g> Just a thought.
> jofarr, sody tn

Jessy, I have done that with my stock turbo. But I'm still in the  
initial stages of flight testing and did not want to have one more  
thing to wary about. Plus here in FL is getting hot and more power  
means more heat, possibility of detonation and scrapping the  whole  
engine etc. etc. I'll try it NA and later will go for the bigger turbo.
Buly
http://tinyurl.com/dcy36