X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with SMTP id 1149248 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:22:39 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABCJYW9EAGELV8J for (sender ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id LSJSZTJH; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:20:36 PDT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:19:46 -0700 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ignition Failure Message-ID: <20060610.161952.2780.5.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.33 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--__JNP_000_0830.2db1.5006 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 8-6,7-15,17-26,28-40,47-48,53-56,63-64,66-87,88-32767 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 14:7:188940539 X-MAIL-INFO:1b00e4f1e459f97059f1508df161b1a9716490e9750da5e1e964e5d5e57099a5e0e5a989c46d7d214055218930193020610049501975f02d498db1949999a46535fdc1d431c4b9f4d4417d7d0df42134155585d1859d019090e06420e1e5ada0f0e0c0f070384d813df0bd0414d964bd3d81bd75bd1029fdd50d9009e0a5e04464cd706d59cde520f9fd05b99100e1f9705d2d80b02d1d1124501d X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkAgTeYS8gaHkVYYzHeGnrl8lkVtmxDlO9g== X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ----__JNP_000_0830.2db1.5006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What are you saying Dale? -al On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:16:15 -0700 Dale Rogers writes: At the risk of making a "me, too" posting, I'd like to thank Ed for his posting. He wrote almost exactly what I was trying to find a reasonably nice way to say. May I add that, if a person isn't on this list to advance the art of _rotary_ propulsion_, or at least improve their own knowledge therein, then their time would be better spent on whatever they do love. We don't need platitudes about how close to the trees we are flying, or generalities about this risks we are taking. We need practical ideas on how to better implement the systems necessary to keeping our aircraft aloft. As a not-too-humble example of what I'm talking about. When Tracy was bemoaning (okay, that's probably overstating the case) having to make a bump in his cowl to clear the oil filter. I went out to the shop and designed a whole new filter mount that put the filter out of the way, without the need to add extra plumbing for a remote filter. (Unfortunately, my first iteration wasn't a "universal" solution, so my adapter block has been a much better seller.) Platitudes don't solve problems - it takes practical ideas. Dale R. COZY MkIV #1254 Ed Anderson wrote: ... However, these postings have sometimes been taken out of context, misunderstood or misconstrued by others in ways not always accurate and sometimes in a clear attempt to put down either the individual, the motor, the technique, etc, - which is not always pleasing. But, I won't let that deter me for posting, I feel I have done my part by raising the issue for others to consider. Sometimes, I find out from others that my incident may have a possible cause I had not considered. Clearly, if a list is not encouraging individuals to post their incidents - no matter how embarrassing it may be (I have a quite a few in that category) - or otherwise not keeping the discussion professional and in a "problem solving" mode, then fewer individuals will post - to the detriment of us all. ... I don't think taking issue with a posting - if it contains inaccuracies, or appears out of context, or is intentionally misconstrued is necessarily defensive - just a matter of setting the record straight so that others will have a clear and accurate picture of what happened. Also, lets face it, e mails are certainly lacking as a communication medium, just too many way to read something - drawing incorrect inferences that were unintended. In any case, lets all agree to keep posting our incidents - it may save someone's bacon. Best Regards Ed -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ -al wick Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5 N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html ----__JNP_000_0830.2db1.5006 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What are you saying Dale?
 
-al
 
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:16:15 -0700 Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net> writes:
At the risk of making a "me, too" posting, I'd like to thank Ed for = his=20
posting.  He wrote almost exactly what I was trying to find a=20 reasonably
nice way to say.

May I add that, if a person isn't = on=20 this list to advance the art of _rotary_
propulsion_, or at least = improve=20 their own knowledge therein, then their
time would be better spent on= =20 whatever they do love.  We don't need
platitudes about how close= to=20 the trees we are flying, or generalities
about this risks we are=20 taking.  We need practical ideas on how to
better implement the= =20 systems necessary to keeping our aircraft aloft. 

As a=20 not-too-humble example of what I'm talking about.  When Tracy
= was=20 bemoaning (okay, that's probably overstating the case) having to
make= a=20 bump in his cowl to clear the oil filter.  I went out to the shop <= BR>and=20 designed a whole new filter mount that put the filter out of the way,=20
without the need to add extra plumbing for a remote filter. =20
(Unfortunately, my first iteration wasn't a "universal" solution, so = my=20
adapter block has been a much better seller.) 

= Platitudes=20 don't solve problems - it takes practical ideas.

Dale R.
COZY = MkIV=20 #1254


Ed Anderson wrote:
...
However, these postings have sometimes been taken out of context, =
misunderstood or misconstrued by others in ways not always accurate and =
sometimes in a clear attempt to put down either the individual, the motor, =
the technique, etc,  - which is not always pleasing.   But, I won't  let =
that deter me for posting, I feel I have done my part by raising the issue =
for others to consider.  Sometimes, I find out from others  that my =
incident may have a possible cause I had not considered.

Clearly, if a list is not encouraging individuals to post their incidents -=
 no matter how embarrassing it may be (I have a quite a few in that =
category) - or otherwise not keeping the discussion professional and in a "=
problem solving" mode, then fewer individuals will post - to the detriment =
of us all. =20

...

I don't think taking issue with a posting - if it contains inaccuracies, or=
 appears out of context, or is intentionally misconstrued is necessarily =
defensive - just a matter of setting the record straight so that others =
will have a clear and accurate picture of what happened.  Also, lets face =
it, e mails are certainly lacking as a communication medium, just too many =
way to read something - drawing incorrect inferences that were unintended.

In any case, lets all agree to keep posting our incidents - it may save =
someone's bacon.

Best Regards

Ed

  

--

Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/

Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/

 

-al wick
Artificial intelligence in= =20 cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5
N9032U 200+ hours on=20 engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon
Prop construct, Subaru install, = Risk=20 assessment, Glass panel design=20 info:
http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html
----__JNP_000_0830.2db1.5006--