X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <hansconser@gmail.com>
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.198] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 1148931 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:48:05 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.162.198; envelope-from=hansconser@gmail.com
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x7so906981nzc
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=TuhH8WGwGgK/R6e4xYvgfB877rsMFXeqa2p1XC+cs/rmxiig1AwcJVz8A5rysJGbXK1PR8DXJgkGd5trRsGaYXr7GEEOUGHNZdABg8S3rOlNxOP+Ywms5o6oXFhwphA6t+zrH12xD2JuHIj1V0bmlZvC5Q6vKKm9kfgEPf53cBU=
Received: by 10.37.2.45 with SMTP id e45mr5915668nzi;
        Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <hansconser@gmail.com>
Received: from ?69.144.194.97? ( [69.144.194.97])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm6117203nzp.2006.06.10.08.47.18;
        Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
In-Reply-To: <list-1146707@logan.com>
References: <list-1146707@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--151458412
Message-Id: <2dc2fcdfea63c2368bca0f11e2ddd84b@gmail.com>
From: Hans Conser <hansconser@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FWD: Latest on lead scavenger
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:47:13 -0600
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)


--Apple-Mail-1--151458412
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed

>>
>> al p wick wrote:
>>
>>> On piston engines the excess lead does not show up on plugs. That's 
>>> why he doesn't refer to it. I sent him brief note encouraging 
>>> testing with rotary, as it would be good test of his new 
>>> formulation. Either you or Perry would be great test cases. Perry 
>>> because he is so much more sensitive to lead.
>>> http://www.decalinchemicals.com/
>>>

???  Lead deposits are the #1 cause of fouling in aircraft engines.

Hans

--Apple-Mail-1--151458412
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII

<excerpt><excerpt>

<fixed>al p wick wrote:</fixed>


<excerpt><italic><fontfamily><param>Helvetica</param><smaller>On
piston engines the excess lead does not show up on plugs. That's why
he doesn't refer to it. I sent him brief note encouraging testing with
rotary, as it would be good test of his new formulation. Either you or
Perry would be great test cases. Perry because he is so much more
sensitive to lead.</smaller></fontfamily></italic>

<italic><fontfamily><param>Helvetica</param><color><param>0000,0000,EEEE</param><smaller>http://www.decalinchemicals.com/</smaller></color></fontfamily></italic>


</excerpt></excerpt></excerpt>

???  Lead deposits are the #1 cause of fouling in aircraft engines.


Hans


--Apple-Mail-1--151458412--