Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.68.10.86; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <4487A36B.1060402@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:11:23 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FWD: Latest on lead scavenger
References: <list-1145547@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1145547@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

al p wick wrote:

> On piston engines the excess lead does not show up on plugs. That's 
> why he doesn't refer to it. I sent him brief note encouraging testing 
> with rotary, as it would be good test of his new formulation. Either 
> you or Perry would be great test cases. Perry because he is so much 
> more sensitive to lead.
> http://www.decalinchemicals.com/
>  


I didn't see any mention of compatibility tests with composite tanks.  
Just that it's "formulated with an environmentally friendly solvent".  
He seems to be a conscientous supplier, but I do know enough about 
chemistry to know that I don't know enough about chemistry.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,               Ernest Christley     |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----     Dyke Delta Builder    |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |