Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2588101 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:43:24 -0400 Received: from 204.127.197.117 ([204.127.197.117]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2003092119432301400l9i76e>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:43:23 +0000 Received: from [68.51.45.250] by 204.127.197.117; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:43:23 +0000 From: kenpowell@comcast.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: DIE Power Calculations Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:43:23 +0000 X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Sep 12 2003) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VucG93ZWxsQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 Message-ID: Ed, Please bring copies (electronic is OK) to Tracy's. I am interested in understanding the math and would like to work thru the theory. Even though I'm planning on a peripheral port engine this is really interesting stuff. Besides, if I were to come up with a RX-8 motor then I might need this info. Also, you guys need to come to Tracy's and Laura's Fly-in. More fun than Oshkosh! I'm driving 13 hours to get there and consider it time well spent. You won't be sorry. Ken Powell > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Slade" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:17 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: DIE Power Calculations > > > > > My purpose, was not to whip up a business with this information, > > No one was accusing you of that. We Wanklers need good technology to get > the > > best out of our engines. Most of us have climbed a long steep learning > curve > > just building the plane. If someone can "level off the top of the > mountain" > > for us most will be happy to pay for the service. > > > > > I know, I know, if you don't relish it when a good equation comes > > > together, then its hard to explain {:>). > > I used to. Studied physics et all, but I'd rather be flying than learning. > > > > > I'll stop the teasers as it sounds like they are really teasing folks. > > Don't stop. Some must be enjoying it. I am, in a sick kind of way. > > > > Regards, > > John > > > > > > Ok, John - Having been down that road (building for 5 years total), I fully > undestand. I will say had anybody had "off-the-self" solutions to some of > the problems I encountered (regarding the conversion) I would have > undoubtedly be willing to spring a few buck. Like about the 4th time I > re-did my oil cooling set up - just so I wouldn't cook the engine in the > air. > > Clearly, I'm a bit past that point - otherwise I wouldn't have all this time > to sit and the computer and play with developing equations {:>). So thanks > for reminding me of what my earlier perspective would have been like. > > Best Regards > > Ed > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html