X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1089986 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 May 2006 07:58:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.67; envelope-from=bobperk@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([68.19.195.198]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060503115743.DZTT9625.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm60aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 07:57:43 -0400 Received: from HpPavilion310n ([68.19.195.198]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060503115743.MIXT6312.ibm60aec.bellsouth.net@HpPavilion310n> for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 07:57:43 -0400 From: "Bob Perkinson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: SS Exhaust Cones Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 06:59:43 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal George, I have access to a bunch of crusty old boilermakers, that need to be challenged every now and again. As long as the measurements are imperial, and a hammer and cutting torch are involved, I think they can make just about anything, but don't be looking for a guarantee. It will be May 18 before I will be back at the plant. I will see if we can make something that resembles the photo on the web site that Ed posted. No Guarantees. Bob Perkinson Hendersonville, TN. RV9 N658RP Reserved If nothing changes Nothing changes Bob, I gather from your correspondence that you can make SS cones or have access to some who does - true? George (down under) > Ed, > What would be the dimensions of the cones if someone were to make them? > > Bob Perkinson > Hendersonville, TN. > RV9 N658RP Reserved > If nothing changes > Nothing changes > > > > > > > Sounds like the right formula, George - will wait for your project's outcome > before I try cones. Yes, I did find some cone inserts at $60.00 USD each. > I would need 4 for my two tubes - hummm makes one tube sound better all the > time. > > Ed > > > > >> Just the shells, TJ, the 1/8" thick SS washers are history. I have > >> concluded that no reasonable thickness of metal will stand up to the > > exhaust > >> pulse for long if it is perpendicular to the shock wave. I believe that > > if > >> I could shape them into cones where by the shock wave would hit the side > > of > >> the cone at an oblique angle would probably survive - now all I have to > > do > >> is find some {:>). > >> > >> Ed > > > > Ed, > > There plenty of SS cones available in 1.6mm, I'm using them in my exhaust > > which is a joint venture design with Bill Jepson - the idea is to redirect > > the shock waves but not restrict the exhaust, as you have alluded to. > > George ( down under) > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/