Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.197; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au
Message-ID: <002701c66e42$1d07dfb0$15c0683a@george>
From: "george lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1088420@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:42:45 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ed,
My sentiments exactly - they will soon look a bit worse for wear.
I can obviously source them from here but you will be better served if you
can source them locally - some of ours may in fact come from the US.

If you give me a size I will get you a price, what I find the most expensive
is the cost of postage to the USA.
Bob may also have the answer! If he has a contact perhaps you could get them
made out of 321SS
George

> How about a source for the more reasonable priced cones, George.  I
> obviously don't care about the finish since they will go inside - just the
> material and cost.  Thanks
>
> Ed
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "george lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:11 AM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar
>
>
> > Ed,
> > That's way too dear, you should be able to get them for about $10 US ea.
I
> > must admit I had to shop around as well. The ones I ended up with
weren't
> > as
> > perfectly finished as the expensive one but the same material 316SS.
> > Our design has an inner cooling tube and an outer cooling tube and heat
> > shield, all the ends are cones as well!
> > All I have to do is get my welder to finish it.
> > George
> >
> > George ( down under)
> >
> >> Sounds like the right formula, George - will wait for your project's
> > outcome
> >> before I try cones.  Yes, I did find some cone  inserts at $60.00 USD
> > each.
> >> I would need 4 for my two tubes - hummm makes one tube sound better all
> > the
> >> time.
> >>
> >> Ed
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "george lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
> >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> >> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:48 PM
> >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Just the shells, TJ, the 1/8" thick SS washers are history.  I have
> >> >> concluded that no reasonable thickness of metal will stand up to the
> >> > exhaust
> >> >> pulse for long if it is perpendicular to the shock wave.  I believe
> > that
> >> > if
> >> >> I could shape them into cones where by the shock wave would hit the
> > side
> >> > of
> >> >> the cone  at an oblique angle  would probably survive - now all I
have
> > to
> >> > do
> >> >> is find some {:>).
> >> >>
> >> >> Ed
> >> >
> >> > Ed,
> >> > There plenty of SS cones available in 1.6mm, I'm using them in my
> > exhaust
> >> > which is a joint venture design with Bill Jepson - the idea is to
> > redirect
> >> > the shock waves but not restrict the exhaust, as you have alluded to.
> >> > George ( down under)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >> > Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
> >
> >
> > --
> > Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> > Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/