Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.194; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au
Message-ID: <002101c66e41$538a25d0$15c0683a@george>
From: "george lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1088383@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:37:06 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bob,
I gather from your correspondence that you can make SS cones or have access
to some who does - true?
George (down under)

> Ed,
> What would be the dimensions of the cones if someone were to make them?
>
> Bob Perkinson
> Hendersonville, TN.
> RV9 N658RP Reserved
> If nothing changes
> Nothing changes
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sounds like the right formula, George - will wait for your project's
outcome
> before I try cones.  Yes, I did find some cone  inserts at $60.00 USD
each.
> I would need 4 for my two tubes - hummm makes one tube sound better all
the
> time.
>
> Ed
>
> >
> >> Just the shells, TJ, the 1/8" thick SS washers are history.  I have
> >> concluded that no reasonable thickness of metal will stand up to the
> > exhaust
> >> pulse for long if it is perpendicular to the shock wave.  I believe
that
> > if
> >> I could shape them into cones where by the shock wave would hit the
side
> > of
> >> the cone  at an oblique angle  would probably survive - now all I have
to
> > do
> >> is find some {:>).
> >>
> >> Ed
> >
> > Ed,
> > There plenty of SS cones available in 1.6mm, I'm using them in my
exhaust
> > which is a joint venture design with Bill Jepson - the idea is to
redirect
> > the shock waves but not restrict the exhaust, as you have alluded to.
> > George ( down under)
>
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/