X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf04aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1088433 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 May 2006 08:22:29 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.52; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm56aec.bellsouth.net ([68.223.210.96]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060502121757.LQSF12125.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm56aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 08:17:57 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [68.223.210.96]) by ibm56aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060502121756.MUNW19804.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.0.100]> for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 08:17:56 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <972C39B6-9F56-4F2C-9070-6D76600049ED@bellsouth.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bulent Aliev Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:18:00 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) It's about time you guys changed the Subject line. Buly On May 2, 2006, at 8:03 AM, Ed Anderson wrote: > How about a source for the more reasonable priced cones, George. I > obviously don't care about the finish since they will go inside - > just the material and cost. Thanks > > Ed > ----- Original Message ----- From: "george lendich" > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:11 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar > > >> Ed, >> That's way too dear, you should be able to get them for about $10 >> US ea. I >> must admit I had to shop around as well. The ones I ended up with >> weren't as >> perfectly finished as the expensive one but the same material 316SS. >> Our design has an inner cooling tube and an outer cooling tube and >> heat >> shield, all the ends are cones as well! >> All I have to do is get my welder to finish it. >> George >> >> George ( down under) >> >>> Sounds like the right formula, George - will wait for your project's >> outcome >>> before I try cones. Yes, I did find some cone inserts at $60.00 >>> USD >> each. >>> I would need 4 for my two tubes - hummm makes one tube sound >>> better all >> the >>> time. >>> >>> Ed >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "george lendich" >>> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >>> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:48 PM >>> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar >>> >>> >>> > >>> >> Just the shells, TJ, the 1/8" thick SS washers are history. I >>> have >>> >> concluded that no reasonable thickness of metal will stand up >>> to the >>> > exhaust >>> >> pulse for long if it is perpendicular to the shock wave. I >>> believe >> that >>> > if >>> >> I could shape them into cones where by the shock wave would >>> hit the >> side >>> > of >>> >> the cone at an oblique angle would probably survive - now >>> all I have >> to >>> > do >>> >> is find some {:>). >>> >> >>> >> Ed >>> > >>> > Ed, >>> > There plenty of SS cones available in 1.6mm, I'm using them in my >> exhaust >>> > which is a joint venture design with Bill Jepson - the idea is to >> redirect >>> > the shock waves but not restrict the exhaust, as you have >>> alluded to. >>> > George ( down under) >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/ >>> flyrotary/ >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/