X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.102] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1088418 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 May 2006 08:04:00 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-025-165.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.25.165]) by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k42C3C5Q005302 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 08:03:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001601c66de0$654bb4c0$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:03:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine How about a source for the more reasonable priced cones, George. I obviously don't care about the finish since they will go inside - just the material and cost. Thanks Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "george lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:11 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar > Ed, > That's way too dear, you should be able to get them for about $10 US ea. I > must admit I had to shop around as well. The ones I ended up with weren't > as > perfectly finished as the expensive one but the same material 316SS. > Our design has an inner cooling tube and an outer cooling tube and heat > shield, all the ends are cones as well! > All I have to do is get my welder to finish it. > George > > George ( down under) > >> Sounds like the right formula, George - will wait for your project's > outcome >> before I try cones. Yes, I did find some cone inserts at $60.00 USD > each. >> I would need 4 for my two tubes - hummm makes one tube sound better all > the >> time. >> >> Ed >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "george lendich" >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:48 PM >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar >> >> >> > >> >> Just the shells, TJ, the 1/8" thick SS washers are history. I have >> >> concluded that no reasonable thickness of metal will stand up to the >> > exhaust >> >> pulse for long if it is perpendicular to the shock wave. I believe > that >> > if >> >> I could shape them into cones where by the shock wave would hit the > side >> > of >> >> the cone at an oblique angle would probably survive - now all I have > to >> > do >> >> is find some {:>). >> >> >> >> Ed >> > >> > Ed, >> > There plenty of SS cones available in 1.6mm, I'm using them in my > exhaust >> > which is a joint venture design with Bill Jepson - the idea is to > redirect >> > the shock waves but not restrict the exhaust, as you have alluded to. >> > George ( down under) >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >