Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.211.128.10; envelope-from=joeh@pilgrimtech.com
From: "Joe Hull" <joeh@pilgrimtech.com>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Run and Static RPM Report
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:56:43 -0700
Message-ID: <010501c66d94$0b0dd0c0$bb02a8c0@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AcZrOtyahbYfCpwhSzG9CnCk61rNbACWKROQ
In-Reply-To: <list-1085128@logan.com>

> I think the A&P may be a problem also.  I need one because I didn't
> build the airplane.  He sounded OK when I first talked to him, but =
more
> recently he's been talking about checking to make sure the plane was
> built to plans and stuff.  I think he's supposed to check the brakes,
> make sure the flaps aren't falling off, etc.  I think his implication
> is that the original builder could modify anything he wanted to, but
> that I can't.  This view seems to me to go beyond the roll of the A&P
> as I understand it.  I may have to find another one that understands
> experimentals.

Bob, I hate to say it but I think your DAR is right on the A&P. Since =
you
aren't the original "Manufacturer" you can't hold a "repairman's
certificate" for your plane. I asked my DAR what would happen if I =
wanted to
buy an old Long-EZ and restore it. He said I could do the work but I'd =
have
to get an A&P to sign it off. So, you can still do the work but you have =
to
find an A&P that is will to inspect your work and sign off in your =
Airplane
Log.=20

Joe Hull
Cozy Mk-IV #991 (In Phase1 Flight Test -=A010.9 hrs flown)=20
Redmond (Seattle), Washington