|
|
Sounds like the right formula, George - will wait for your project's outcome before I try cones. Yes, I did find some cone inserts at $60.00 USD each. I would need 4 for my two tubes - hummm makes one tube sound better all the time.
Ed
----- Original Message ----- From: "george lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar
Just the shells, TJ, the 1/8" thick SS washers are history. I have
concluded that no reasonable thickness of metal will stand up to the
exhaust
pulse for long if it is perpendicular to the shock wave. I believe that
if
I could shape them into cones where by the shock wave would hit the side
of
the cone at an oblique angle would probably survive - now all I have to
do
is find some {:>).
Ed
Ed,
There plenty of SS cones available in 1.6mm, I'm using them in my exhaust
which is a joint venture design with Bill Jepson - the idea is to redirect
the shock waves but not restrict the exhaust, as you have alluded to.
George ( down under)
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
|
|