Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #31577
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:24:07 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sounds like the right formula, George - will wait for your project's outcome before I try cones.  Yes, I did find some cone  inserts at $60.00 USD each. I would need 4 for my two tubes - hummm makes one tube sound better all the time.

Ed

----- Original Message ----- From: "george lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: new hangar



Just the shells, TJ, the 1/8" thick SS washers are history.  I have
concluded that no reasonable thickness of metal will stand up to the
exhaust
pulse for long if it is perpendicular to the shock wave.  I believe that
if
I could shape them into cones where by the shock wave would hit the side
of
the cone  at an oblique angle  would probably survive - now all I have to
do
is find some {:>).

Ed

Ed,
There plenty of SS cones available in 1.6mm, I'm using them in my exhaust
which is a joint venture design with Bill Jepson - the idea is to redirect
the shock waves but not restrict the exhaust, as you have alluded to.
George ( down under)


--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/



Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster