X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1087017 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 May 2006 07:44:20 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=NM+ZlHeYVXTgCIbqAVHoj5v2KbCduHTUkwqeYZMbpHx8Z+e/LeD5QndrFoEZY8xK; h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.49.145.5] (helo=[192.168.0.100]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FaWoR-0001Ly-WF for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 May 2006 07:43:36 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1A31E8F1-9DB8-4ABD-92C1-8AE928971264@earthlink.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jerry Hey Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Run and Static RPM Report Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:43:34 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7924fc0f4621ec7c3cb2212fbc40356a60350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.49.145.5 Bob, Did you notice the EGT during the WOT? Jerry On Apr 28, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Bob White wrote: > Hi Buly, > > There's a few things on the list he sent that doesn't sound quite > right. As long as I can do it without too much of a hassle, I guess I > will. The actual wording is "a ground run to max power in a nose high > attitude approaching an in flight stall". That sounds like an > invitation to do an inadvertent take-off if I ever heard one. When I > flew with the previous owner, the time from full power application to > lift off was about 5 seconds. > > I think the A&P may be a problem also. I need one because I didn't > build the airplane. He sounded OK when I first talked to him, but > more > recently he's been talking about checking to make sure the plane was > built to plans and stuff. I think he's supposed to check the brakes, > make sure the flaps aren't falling off, etc. I think his implication > is that the original builder could modify anything he wanted to, but > that I can't. This view seems to me to go beyond the roll of the A&P > as I understand it. I may have to find another one that understands > experimentals. > > Bob W. > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:35:30 -0400 > Bulent Aliev wrote: > >> Hi Bob, looks like you are making lots of power. My DAR never asked >> for high speed taxi, or even if I have run the engine. I don't think >> high speed taxi is a requirement. >> Buly >> On Apr 28, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Bob White wrote: >> >>> I've been trying to finish up all the little nitpicking details >>> and a >>> few big details so I haven't ran my engine for quite a while. I >>> made >>> up my mind to get some time on it today. The weather was a bit >>> nasty >>> today with the winds kicking up to 20-30 kts (it wasn't that bad >>> when I >>> started). I fired it up, and the first problem showed up - No >>> charging. The new alternator mount from Pineapple racing is power >>> coated and insulating the alternator from the block. I rigged up a >>> jumper to fix that problem, and started the engine again. All was >>> well. After taxiing around for 1/2 hour or so, I hit 4 hours run >>> time. Bruce T.'s break in instructions was to run the engine 5 >>> hours >>> below 4500, but I couldn't stand the suspense any longer. I really >>> wanted to find out what my static RPM was. So, I stopped it heading >>> into the wind and gave it full throttle. I saw 6400 RPM and backed >>> off. >>> The mixture was going a little lean, so I turned up the mixture and >>> got >>> 6600 RPM. Max manifold pressure was a little over 23. (Don't >>> forget >>> that I'm at 6000 ft.) That's a little over the 6000 RPM limit >>> Bruce has >>> for the 5 to 15 hour segment, but his regime seems quite a bit more >>> conservative that some of the other break-in schemes I've heard on >>> here. :) With this prop, I suspect I could exceed my RPM >>> redline of >>> 7500. If everything is looking OK, I may increase that to 7700. >>> >>> It seems like I'm a little under propped. This prop is 68 in. dia, >>> with >>> a 78 in. pitch. >>> >>> I also found out that a little air flowing over the rads is a good >>> thing. As I mentioned earlier, the wind was kicking up to about 30 >>> knots toward the end. While taxiing downwind, the water temp >>> started >>> climbing above 200 F. I shut the engine down, got out and pushed >>> the >>> plane around into the wind. After starting the engine back up, the >>> temps dropped down to 160F. >>> >>> Now the next big question is how badly will my new cowling and >>> cooling >>> plenum screw up the cooling. I'm only about 1/2 done with the >>> cowling >>> mods and getting ready to jump back into some more fiberglass work. >>> Apparently according to the checklist my DAR sent, I need to do a >>> high >>> speed taxi test. I'm not going to do that until I think the >>> plane is >>> airworthy, even if I don't have the paperwork!! >>> >>> Bob W. >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.bob-white.com >>> N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (first engine start 1/7/06) >>> Custom Cables for your rotary installation - >>> http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/ >>> >>> -- >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > -- > http://www.bob-white.com > N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (first engine start 1/7/06) > Custom Cables for your rotary installation - > http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/ > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/