X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from backend1.xplornet.com ([207.179.143.200] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTPS id 1055884 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 03:32:02 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.179.143.200; envelope-from=echolakeresort@telus.net Received: from echolake-cc8a26 (206-47-94-97.anikast.net [206.47.94.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by backend1.xplornet.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k327V0DK019886 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 04:31:04 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <442F7E29.000007.03720@ECHOLAKE-CC8A26> Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:32:57 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Content-Type: Multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_XM33WCW0000000000000" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (4502089) From: "Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" References: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Longer props [ was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Very short intake manifold length X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 --------------Boundary-00=_XM33WCW0000000000000 Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_XM33RN00000000000000" --------------Boundary-00=_XM33RN00000000000000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you David.=0D Georges B =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: David Carter=0D Date: 04/01/06 23:22:24=0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Longer props [ was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Very short intake manifold length=0D =0D Georges, I don't have my RX-8 engine mounted and don't have a prop - I do have the RD-1C 2.85 to 1 PSRU. I'm planning on an 80 inch prop for my RV= -6. Figure I'll have 10" ground clearance with tail up. (not sure of that, y= et)=0D =0D I'll insert a pdf version of my spreadsheet that gives prop tip speed and mach number, with Mazda's "revised down" hp numbers in a column I added tonight. I'll be using the lower power version of the Renesis engine 192= hp max at 7000rpm (7500 rpm max limit). The chart also has the "higher hp engine" numbers (231hp at 8200, with engine limit of 9000rpm)=0D =2E . . Inserting the pdf didn't work. Will attach to this e-mail - hope= it works=0D =0D David Carter=0D =0D ----- Original Message ----- =0D From: Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher) =0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft =0D Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:41 AM=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Very short intake manifold length=0D =0D =0D Thanks Lynn=0D Sure would like to hear from anyone using a large prop on a 13b. =0D =0D =0D Georges Boucher=0D 2126 Creighton Valley Road=0D Lumby, British Columbia=0D Canada V0E 2G1=0D Phone:(250) 547-6434=0D 1- 877-547-6434=0D Fax:: (250) 547-2342=0D www.echolakefishingresort.com=0D echolakeresort@xplornet.com =0D =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Lehanover@aol.com=0D Date: 04/01/06 01:16:36=0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Very short intake manifold length=0D =0D In a message dated 3/31/2006 9:54:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, echolakeresort@telus.net writes:=0D Thanks Lynn=0D I would like to get 200hp at 7500RPM, With a gross weight of 2300lbs on floats & a cruise speed of about 120mph it's not like an RV. My plan is a plugs up position with a 3 stage Weaver dry sump pump and a 14 quart oil tank. I have a 90 13b NA (9.7:1 rotors) Mazdatrix street port template, 3= GM evaporator cores in series & RX7 oil cooler (2 if needed), RWS 2.85:1 re-drive, EM2 & EC2 with an IVO 84" controllable propeller. Is 200HP a pi= pe dream?=0D Georges B.=0D =0D It is possible that you could get very close to 200 HP with a street port= =2E The last conversations I had with the two great engine builders I know wa= s that the E production engines (13B treet ported two 38MM chokes) were producing 229HP and 231 HP, but at close to 9,000. In reading about Dave Lemons engines (also E production) he said he could not get used to shift= ing after the 10,000 RPM light comes on. These are in very fast cars, and in most cases faster than mine (GT-3 12As). Google Dave Lemon. These are running a limited (by rules) street port.=0D =0D Turning that big a prop 2,631 RPM even with no pitch is perhaps hopefull.= =0D The airboat people tend to very low pitch large diameter props with wide blades. They also use 550 cubic inch 350 HP engines. The latest gag is tw= o props counter rotating at differing RPM. That so they can load the boat a= nd leave from the dry grass into the water and not need a loading ramp. Chec= k with Ken Weller on that float plane stuff. He uses a 100 HP nitrous shot (available at any hot rod shop) to explode out of the water. He has the extra fuel required figured out and shuts off the trailing ignition durin= g the shot to prevent detonation. Remember the definition of detonation? Ve= ry clever. =0D =0D If you were looking for 190 HP with a 50HP nitrous shot on top of that to pop up I would say no problem. I have no feel for the drag of floats vice= a displacement hull. Sounds like it would be less. =0D =0D I am down to 6 quarts in the small holding tank. Tall and small diameter.= It was a new fire extinguisher bottle. Clean and light. If you don't already own it, I would skip the weaver brothers pump. I have one. It is a gear a= nd idler type and cannot pull much of a vacuum and unless new inside cannot produce top pressure. It just has very little displacement. A gearotor (r= ing and rotor) type is what I use now. The old round style Peterson is fine. = the newer square bodied Peterson is junk. The pressure section splits open al= ong the bolt holes. Only a college graduate would build a square pressure ves= sel My current pump is the Moroso with the Ford pressure section (bigger rotors) 1 1/8" instead of 7/8" (I think). Peterson does have a selection = of Gilmer belt pulleys at a good price. The belts are cheap through any powe= r transmission store. A friend just paid me another Moroso pump that I buil= t for a Datsun years back for building him a rotary he had damaged. So now = I have a spare Moroso pump. =0D =0D Unless there is a real clearance problem, I would avoid the plugs up thin= g. It adds several engineering problems to a very busy program. You can move the filter to a remote location with no problem. Planes with that layout tend to land on roads more than others. =0D =0D Lynn E. Hanover=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_XM33RN00000000000000 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you David.
Georges B 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 04/01/06 23:= 22:24
Subject: [FlyRotar= y] Longer props [ was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Very short intake manifold leng= th
 
Georges, I don't have my= RX-8 engine mounted and don't have a prop - I do have the RD-1C 2.85 to = 1 PSRU.  I'm planning on an 80 inch prop for my RV-6.  Figure I= 'll have 10" ground clearance with tail up. (not sure of that, yet)
 
I'll insert a pdf versio= n of my spreadsheet that gives prop tip speed and mach number, with Mazda= 's "revised down" hp numbers in a column I added tonight.  I'll be u= sing the lower power version of the Renesis engine 192hp max at 7000rpm (= 7500 rpm max limit).  The chart also has the "higher hp engine" numb= ers (231hp at 8200, with engine limit of 9000rpm)
. . . Inserting the pdf = didn't work.  Will attach to this e-mail - hope it works
 
David Carter
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:4= 1 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Very shor= t intake manifold length

Thanks Lynn
<snip> Sure would like to hear from anyone using a large prop = on a 13b. <snip> <= /FONT>
 
Georges Boucher
2126 Creighton Valley Road
Lumby, British Columbia
Canada  V0E 2G1
Phone:(250) 547-6434
1- 877-547-6434
Fax:: (250) 547-2342
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 04/01/06 01:= 16:36
Subject: [FlyRotar= y] Re: Very short intake manifold length
 
In a message dated 3/31/2006 9:54:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, ech= olakeresort@telus.net writes:
Thanks Lynn
I would like to get 200hp at 7500RPM, With a gross weight of 2300lbs= on floats & a cruise speed of about 120mph it's not like an RV.= My plan is a plugs up position with a 3 stage Weaver dry sump pump and a= 14 quart oil tank. I have a 90 13b NA (9.7:1 rotors) Mazdatrix street po= rt template, 3GM evaporator cores in series & RX7 oil cooler (2 if ne= eded), RWS 2.85:1 re-drive, EM2 & EC2 with an IVO 84" controllab= le propeller. Is 200HP a pipe dream?
Georges B.
 
It is possible that you could get very close to 200 H= P with a street port. The last conversations I had with the two great eng= ine builders I know was that the E production engines (13B treet ported t= wo 38MM chokes) were producing 229HP and 231 HP, but at close to 9,000. I= n reading about Dave Lemons engines (also E production) he said he could = not get used to shifting after the 10,000 RPM light comes on. These are i= n very fast cars, and in most cases faster than mine (GT-3 12As).  G= oogle Dave Lemon. These are running a limited (by rules) street port.
 
Turning that big a prop 2,631 RPM even with no pitch = is perhaps hopefull.
The airboat people tend to very low pitch large diame= ter props with wide blades. They also use 550 cubic inch 350 HP engines. = The latest gag is two props counter rotating at differing RPM. That = so they can load the boat and leave from the dry grass into the water and= not need a loading ramp. Check with Ken Weller on that float plane stuff= =2E He uses a 100 HP nitrous shot (available at any hot rod shop) to expl= ode out of the water. He has the extra fuel required figured out and shut= s off the trailing ignition during the shot to prevent detonation. Rememb= er the definition of detonation? Very clever. 
 
If you were looking for 190 HP with a 50HP nitrous sh= ot on top of that to pop up I would say no problem. I have no feel for th= e drag of floats vice a displacement hull. Sounds like it would be l= ess.  
 
I am down to 6 quarts in the small holding tank. Tall= and small diameter. It was a new fire extinguisher bottle. Clean and lig= ht. If you don't already own it, I would skip the weaver brothers pump. I= have one. It is a gear and idler type and cannot pull much of a vacuum a= nd unless new inside cannot produce top pressure. It just has very little= displacement. A gearotor (ring and rotor) type is what I use now. The ol= d round style Peterson is fine. the newer square bodied Peterson is junk.= The pressure section splits open along the bolt holes. Only a college gr= aduate would build a square pressure vessel. My current pump is the = Moroso with the Ford pressure section (bigger rotors) 1 1/8" instead of 7= /8" (I think). Peterson does have a selection of Gilmer belt pulleys at a= good price. The belts are cheap through any power transmission store. A = friend just paid me another Moroso pump that I built for a Datsun years b= ack for building him a rotary he had damaged. So now I have a spare Moros= o pump. 
 
Unless there is a real clearance problem, I would avo= id the plugs up thing. It adds several engineering problems to a very bus= y program. You can move the filter to a remote location with no problem. = Planes with that layout tend to land on roads more than others.
 
Lynn E. Hanover
 
 
 
 
--------------Boundary-00=_XM33RN00000000000000-- --------------Boundary-00=_XM33WCW0000000000000 Content-Type: image/gif; name="sg-a854001.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: R0lGODlheQBAAPECAAAAAABUqL29vQAAACH5BAEAAAIALAAAAAB5AEAAAAL+lI+py+0Po5y02ouz 3rz7D4biSJbmiabqyrbuC8fyTNf2jef6zve+EggKg7/bEEh0HX/JRqAlNDw9TeoUV61moh9t7YoA bwVijfe7KFuI57Wapm5Tru9KnXHv0pfmQ37ylxDIMTU0CEFHNXe4FceI9yRnByipCEnIRUj5eHFX +cCnGZFpBVbJGfY5NxplqJqWeYrqN+sk10pm6hqau2uIKEUaLLZLu+fmSzv8C2SMNwwqBRvJVsi2 HExSJskruFxXnZyq29v66paqmOVV62fMPEJeCtndcQzim6+/z9/v749pSZJziAjygOfNoANcRRZ6 EiaqXY9fEtNkayhBWMVAZtIwskIiopDHjBZDiBw5CqRJhQ23oYQzcONLexBn2ryJM6fOnTx7+vwJ NKjQoUSLGj2KNKnSpUybOn0KNSqMAgA7 --------------Boundary-00=_XM33WCW0000000000000--