Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.72; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <4411F191.1000704@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:37:21 -0500
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA's, Cooling and Sport Aviation Mag..
References: <list-1029872@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1029872@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James wrote:

> Ernest, I did not see that specific paper.  Do you know an easy to 
> find it?  Thanks.
>
> Regards; James Freeman
>
> Ernest Christley wrote:
>
>> James wrote:
>>
>>> Second point:  I believe that a reversed direction NACA scoop would 
>>> make an excellent low drag exit port for the cooling air stream.  If 
>>> anyone tries it, please let us know your findings.
>>
>>
>>
>> According to the article, NACA tried it.  It didn't work very well.  
>> A straight sided 'boxy' exit works much better.
>

The Sport Aviation article referred to it.  I took the author's word for 
it because I seem to recall having read such a paper before.   I would 
have to search the NACA site to find it again.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,               Ernest Christley     |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----     Dyke Delta Builder    |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |