X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 986890 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:13:19 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.68; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm62aec.bellsouth.net ([209.215.60.142]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060216031236.TUEZ21369.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm62aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:12:36 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [209.215.60.142]) by ibm62aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060216031235.LKTJ2966.ibm62aec.bellsouth.net@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:12:35 -0500 Message-ID: <43F3EDA0.9070808@bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:12:32 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Why do this? / was Another Rotary failure. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit WALTER B KERR wrote: >Yes, flying is a risky business! We all believe we have a better >mousetrap, especially an engineer with 33 years in the turbojet design >business. If I had to do over, I would copy Tracy to nth detail since he >has been very sucessful at it. My installation has worked fine, but >believe it would be safer with Tracy's tried and proven system. My >biggest disappointment has been my lack of confidence in going distant >places because I see Ed rebuilding an engine in LA, Dave hauling an >airplane back from N CA to S CA, and now Chuck for the 2nd time. I know >we can and will explain the problems. The rotary is basically a more >dependable peice of equipment, but I was more comfortable with a Lycoming >which I flew to places that were not nice to stop in such as over Mount >Redoubt and Cook's Inlet in Alaska. It is interesting and it would be fun >to have a 3 or 4 to experiment and play around with a rotary, if you are >young and energetic! > >More power to all of you who are blazing the future of aviation with >alternative engines, but once again with family and time considerations >believe I would benefit from a lycoming. Do you wish to swap out your 4 >engine for a rotary Charlie? Or is there anyone else out there with a >lycoming O-320 who would like to swap installations. > >Bernie > snipped Sorry, Bernie. If it runs, I don't 'fix it'. Wish I'd known last fall you would be interested in a Lyc. My neighbor's -8 (sold to someone else) went down in a field due to fuel starvation & I didn't bid very much on the salvage because I didn't want the engine. I can fully understand your motives for the change. I'm just hoping there will be a package that I can have confidence in by the time I'm ready for an engine. Charlie