Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #29886
From: David Leonard <wdleonard@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Suitability of NPG for Rotary Engine use
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:44:10 -0800
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>


On 2/1/06, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:
You are right, Jesse - no conflict here.  If both a reciprocating engine ( which is normally a iron block(or steel sleeve inserts) with an aluminum piston) and a rotary loose coolant, my bet is the iron block will at some point seize from overheating.  Because the aluminum piston will expand faster than the iron/steel due to the heat.  Just the opposite with a rotary (as at least two/three folks have proven), the aluminum housing expands (and some compression/power is lost) faster than the iron rotor - so no seizing even though the engine is cooked.  
 
Never said you wouldn't damage a rotary with a loss of coolant, just that it would keep running as long as then engine had fire and fuel.  Landing with a damaged engine with some power available beats dead sticking in a seized engine in my opinion.
 
Ed
 
In my limited experience of overheating rotary engines and then dead sticking onto freeways, you can expect about 4 minutes from inital overheat to complete loss of engine power.  The engine will not seize, but the complete loss of compression will prevent any power production.
 
I invite other to verify my data  :-)
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster