Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #29803
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis Cooling oddity
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:56:09 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Here's another possibility to throw on the fire, Tracy.
 
When I was doing some cooling test (several years ago), it was clear that the coolant in the block was NOT like a pot of water waiting to boil.  In fact, it was more like a fire hose being used to force water through the coolant galleys.  I noticed that when I ran the engine with the radiator cap off, the temperature sensors I had (used the stock rear housing one as well as one at the pump outlet) indicated that the coolant had air pockets in (might related to caviation as well), the coolant temperature would jump and surge.  When I placed the radiator cap on the system the coolant temperature would stabilize and no variations could be detected.
 
I suspect that by putting a radiator cap on and pressurizing to 10 psi that your coolant system perhaps no longer has air bubbles in the coolant stream (certainly makes it a bit more difficult to form them with 10 psi to fight) .  If that were the case then, it might would result inbetter heat transfer and equalization of heat on bothsides of your exhaust port.  Just a thought.
 
Ed
 
Ed Anderson
Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis Cooling oddity

As Ed mentioned in a recent post,  He gave me his spare radiator cap when mine was found to be defective.  It had been bad since day one when I installed it on the Renesis installation.  I had noticed that the coolant pressure was low (almost zero) after the engine cooled down after initial climb out but had written it off as normal for the new system since it was cooling adequately.
 
I've been flying with good pressure after replacing the cap and  noticed that the cooling system performance was generally better.  What really interested me was the change in temp differential between the water temp at the combustion chamber side and the intake/exhaust port side (I measure it in both locations).  Previously, there was an 8 - 10 degree rise in coolant temp as it went through the port side and I had assumed this was due to the increased exhaust port heat transfer to the coolant on the Renesis.  This really bugged me since it represents a LOT of BTU into the coolant.  Now that the coolant pressure is normal (~10 psi at cruise) the port side temp increase is down to 1 - 3 degrees.  The question is, why?
 
So far, the leading theory is water pump cavitation.  The low coolant pressure allowed the pump to cavitate which reduces coolant flow rate which in turn caused the temp rise to be higher.  As a side note, the Renesis uses the same pump design as the 3rd gen, a cheap stamped sheet metal impeller instead of the nicely scrolled cast impeller of the 2nd gen.  I think the stamped impeller is more likely to cavitate. 
 
Anyway, this almost eliminates what I considered to be the only down side to the Renesis vs the earlier 13B.
 
Tracy
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster