Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #29801
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Renesis Cooling oddity
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:24:28 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
As Ed mentioned in a recent post,  He gave me his spare radiator cap when mine was found to be defective.  It had been bad since day one when I installed it on the Renesis installation.  I had noticed that the coolant pressure was low (almost zero) after the engine cooled down after initial climb out but had written it off as normal for the new system since it was cooling adequately.
 
I've been flying with good pressure after replacing the cap and  noticed that the cooling system performance was generally better.  What really interested me was the change in temp differential between the water temp at the combustion chamber side and the intake/exhaust port side (I measure it in both locations).  Previously, there was an 8 - 10 degree rise in coolant temp as it went through the port side and I had assumed this was due to the increased exhaust port heat transfer to the coolant on the Renesis.  This really bugged me since it represents a LOT of BTU into the coolant.  Now that the coolant pressure is normal (~10 psi at cruise) the port side temp increase is down to 1 - 3 degrees.  The question is, why?
 
So far, the leading theory is water pump cavitation.  The low coolant pressure allowed the pump to cavitate which reduces coolant flow rate which in turn caused the temp rise to be higher.  As a side note, the Renesis uses the same pump design as the 3rd gen, a cheap stamped sheet metal impeller instead of the nicely scrolled cast impeller of the 2nd gen.  I think the stamped impeller is more likely to cavitate. 
 
Anyway, this almost eliminates what I considered to be the only down side to the Renesis vs the earlier 13B.
 
Tracy
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster