10lbs. That is about the weight of a rotor. But
you'll be spinning it
3 times as fast, so it'll have 8 times the momentum
(momentum is
velocity squared, right?). The object is to keep the
shaft from
speeding up and slowing down, and I think increasing the
momentum 8
times would accomplish that well.
Hi
Ernest,
All WAG's
appreciated. I'm not sure the biggest problem is the missing mass of the
2nd rotor, but rather the missing firing pulse. If we were to continue
your momentum thought though, the flywheel advantage would be even
greater than you suggested. Remember that the center of the
rotor mass is traveling in a much smaller radius circle than the
mass of the flywheel ring that I proposed. Heck, maybe that 1.5 lbs of
weight that I had before would have made up for the missing rotor
:-)
other ideas: Have the disc water/laser cut. And
you don't need 4130,
so have the cutter use whatever steel they have on
hand. Have a brake
shop turn the disc and balance it, or you might
just be able to get a
brake rotor that would bolt right into place with
little or no
modification. The heavy duty Matco rotors I just bought
seem to be
around those dimensions if memory serves.
Interesting
thoughts. I'm still leaning toward trying to install 4 separate weights,
which makes it possible to do this without pulling the drive off. It
also makes balancing a simple matter of precisely weighing the added
weights. I can buy 1/2" steel discs in various diameters from McMaster
Carr, so I would just have to drill a hole in the middle, and bolt them
on. I wonder what the limit of a 7/16" bolt is for holding a
couple pound weight spinning at 8000 rpm. Probably don't want
to have anything in the arc of the flex plate the first time it was
run up :-0
Dale,
I thought about
flywheels, but aren't they always manual trans flywheels, made to install on
the shaft itself? I need something that coexists with the
current auto balance weight, flex plate, and Tracy's dampener
plate.
Thanks,
Rusty (trying hopelessly to
resist)
PS- Congrats to Joe! If this keeps
up, people are going to think that rotaries can only fly backwards
:-)