X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ccerelbas01.cce.hp.com ([161.114.21.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTPS id 934648 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:53:59 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=161.114.21.104; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (compaqcce.compaq.com [16.47.68.171]) by ccerelbas01.cce.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB1834510 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:53:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from [16.83.224.140] (unknown [16.83.224.140]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA0A35E8 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:53:01 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43D13188.7060606@cox.net> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:52:56 -0700 From: Dale Rogers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] flywheel weight? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Russell Duffy wrote: > Greetings, > > Yes, I'm trying to avoid spending too much time on this, but I'm > tempted to try adding more significant flywheel weight to the single > rotor, to see it it will behave better. I realized this isn't an > ideal solution to an already heavy engine, but it might still be worth > trying. > > My question is how much weight should I add to make sure this will get > rid of the torque reversal issues? > > I understand that weight added farther out from the center has more > effect than weight close to the center. Ideally, I would plan to make > a ring, with about an 11" OD (or as large as I can without interfering > with the starter ring), and about 7" ID. This would bolt to the > redrive side of the dampener plate, using the existing 7/16" bolts. > I made an estimate of the weight of steel, by measuring the volume of > a 4130 plate, and weighing it. The result was 4.5 oz per cu in. My > best estimate is that I can get close to 10 lbs, using a half inch > thick piece of steel. Unfortunately, this will be quite time > consuming, and tough to fabricate, balance, etc. > > The other option is to try to add more weight than I did before at the > 4 bolt locations. This is a much easier plan to implement, but I'm > afraid I'll be lucky to get 5 lbs added using this method. > > Anyone want to take a swag at how well this would work? > > Thanks, > Rusty (resistance is futile) Rusty, How about one of the aluminum flywheels often sold to racers? Dale R.