X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 933038 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:20:24 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.199; envelope-from=russell.duffy@gmail.com Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so301924wra for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:19:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:importance:in-reply-to; b=f+IwbkcSJsQz5kTTnyMFiQKclxb2XFcUwNynhKiv73CDg2+WOx7T2Y16jtFMeGvEVp+l2pSgwWoOmCbFN5EPqQUrE/ur2pCpvmCYCr8lmY5SuKoXZwthIwZJDXEdUxC+PhYHeT9CU7N0RqXXbDywSEID2cBOdldB6Y1sFwS0dI8= Received: by 10.54.66.4 with SMTP id o4mr1204445wra; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:19:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rd ( [65.6.194.9]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 27sm2166796wrl.2006.01.19.11.19.37; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:19:37 -0800 (PST) From: "Russell Duffy" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Fw: Lead Solvent or Cleaner Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:19:36 -0600 Message-ID: <000e01c61d2d$49d09ca0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C61CFA.FF362CA0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C61CFA.FF362CA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I suspect that most of these products may be cleaners rather than = solvents despite what they are called. Anyone really know? =20 =20 You now know as much as anyone does about these things :-) There's a = heap of advertising done to make you think one cleaner is better than = another, but I've never found one that really seems significantly better or = worse, unless you account for the smell. Hoppe's does stink, so maybe it's = better :-) =20 =20 Unfortunately, of all the things I've tried, none have just magically = rinsed away the lead deposits. Even soaking and scrubbing doesn't usually work that well for me. Hopefully, someone will list their secret, guaranteed = to work solvent, so I can buy some. =20 =20 Good luck, Rusty (safe full of pistols, but can't remember where the range is) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C61CFA.FF362CA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I suspect that most of these products may be = cleaners=20 rather than solvents despite what they are called.  Anyone really=20 know?  
 
You now=20 know as much as anyone does about these things :-)   There's a = heap of=20 advertising done to make you think one cleaner is better than another, = but I've=20 never found one that really seems significantly better or worse, = unless you=20 account for the smell.  Hoppe's does stink, so maybe it's better=20 :-)  
 
Unfortunately, of all the things I've tried, = none have=20 just magically rinsed away the lead deposits.  Even soaking and = scrubbing=20 doesn't usually work that well for me.  Hopefully, someone will = list their=20 secret, guaranteed to work solvent, so I can buy some. =20
 
Good=20 luck,
Rusty (safe=20 full of pistols, but can't remember where the range = is)
 
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C61CFA.FF362CA0--