X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 925677 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:27:03 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=sladerj@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([72.144.102.32]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060113160144.MPDE18277.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm60aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:01:44 -0500 Received: from JSLADE ([72.144.102.32]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060113160143.PJCL12303.ibm60aec.bellsouth.net@JSLADE> for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:01:43 -0500 From: "John Slade" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Props Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:03:38 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0B14_01C61831.01C21AC0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0B14_01C61831.01C21AC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Joe, It might work with an adjustable prop like an IVO that goes up to 104 pitch. The rpm I get at wot with the 2.17 at high altitude cruise will tell. If I have pitch to spare, then a 2.85 might be ok. That'll have to wait until I get my T04 turbo installed. Regards, John -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Joe Berki Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 8:59 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Props I have been watching the progress of those using the 2.85 PSRU with a large prop and was wondering how this combination could be made to work on a canard pusher. I am thinking of going with a P port engine so the 2.85 ratio would work, but i don't think the AC can handle a long prop due to ground clearance and rotation. Any thoughts? Thanks for any help. Joe Berki Limo EZ Sanding ------=_NextPart_000_0B14_01C61831.01C21AC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Joe,
It=20 might work with an adjustable prop like an IVO that goes up to 104 = pitch. The=20 rpm I get at wot with the 2.17 at high altitude cruise will tell. = If I have=20 pitch to spare, then a 2.85 might be ok. That'll have to wait until I = get my T04=20 turbo installed.
Regards,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20 [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Joe=20 Berki
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 8:59 AM
To: = Rotary=20 motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] = Props

I have been watching the progress of = those using=20 the 2.85 PSRU with a large prop and was wondering how this combination = could=20 be made to work on a canard pusher.  I am thinking of going with = a P port=20 engine so the 2.85 ratio would work, but i don't think the AC can = handle a=20 long prop due to ground clearance and rotation.  Any = thoughts? =20 Thanks for any help.
 
Joe Berki
Limo EZ
 
Sanding
------=_NextPart_000_0B14_01C61831.01C21AC0--