X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 924820 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:30:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.199; envelope-from=russell.duffy@gmail.com Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so520206wra for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:29:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:importance:in-reply-to:x-mimeole; b=tjV8L1BbWg6kKuDhlJkJYrW1QuF1D/oirfl+OLMwrGc4+ECziVfnKfkEIx6PQx9YrNuexBCcfHYmyuOQSMngaAbfzC4WQAweCQwkKHytbA9MxqlhABwnaLQhXVg8SBrgrqWTRJeRkXW77lhp/J8ce1gM5fStOwnSaTVNXI3hfh8= Received: by 10.54.121.8 with SMTP id t8mr123715wrc; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:29:44 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rd ( [65.6.194.9]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 29sm3714072wrl.2006.01.12.19.29.44; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:29:44 -0800 (PST) From: "Russell Duffy" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: return lines Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:29:44 -0600 Message-ID: <000201c617f1$99b549f0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C617BF.4F1AD9F0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C617BF.4F1AD9F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was wondering about the returning it to the far end of the tank, I = believe that in my configuration, (long skinny tank in leading edge) there would = be some 'hangup ' of fuel that is returned and has to flow back down the = tank to the pickup bay. I haven't decided on what to do yet.=20 =20 Hi Bill, =20 That's a good point, but would only be in issue if you ran your tank = down to fumes. None of us plans to do that of course, but it's still a = significant point to consider in case we find we aren't perfect some day :-) =20 Cheers, Rusty (Gmail server up again) =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C617BF.4F1AD9F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I was wondering about the = returning it to the=20 far end of the tank, I believe that in my configuration, (long skinny = tank in=20 leading edge) there would be some 'hangup ' of fuel that is returned and = has to=20 flow back down the tank to the pickup bay. I haven't decided on what to = do=20 yet. 
 
Hi Bill,
 
That's a good point, but would only be in = issue if you=20 ran your tank down to fumes.  None of us plans to do that of = course, but=20 it's still a significant point to consider in case we find we aren't = perfect=20 some day :-)
 
Cheers,
Rusty (Gmail server up again) =20
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C617BF.4F1AD9F0--