X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 923967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:40:00 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.85; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from Quail (bgp01386375bgs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2006011217391501400dh7a6e>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:39:15 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:39:30 -0700 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cool Tube Muffler Sound Readings Message-Id: <20060112103930.512db283.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.9 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:33:55 -0600 "Russell Duffy" wrote: > I would like to take some readings from a certified engine for > comparison. I measured 104db at 3000 & 4000 rpm from my spiral flow > muffler. > > > I'd bet the average Lycoming would make a lot more noise at 3000-4000 rpm > :-) > > Rusty (free from in-laws until Monday) > That does raise an interesting question though. At what rpm should I run a Lycoming to compare to the rotary at 3000? For the same prop speed, it should be a little over 1000. It seems that WOT static should be a fair comparison point for both engines. Then how much does the prop affect the results? Bob W. -- http://www.bob-white.com N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (first engine start 1/7/06) Custom Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/